12-02-2011, 08:10 AM
(12-01-2011, 10:15 PM)zenmaster Wrote:(11-30-2011, 06:36 AM)Namaste Wrote:(11-30-2011, 01:15 AM)zenmaster Wrote: I've seen it demo'd before and this looks like the more of the same. I don't see anything special? Is there supposed to be an implication there?
Correct me if I'm mistaken, but I was under the impression these generated energy due to the implementation of the torus shape.
No. They create turn electricity into a magnetic field. They do not generate energy, that's already coming out of the electrical socket.
In the TED talk, the presenter mentions it wasn't connected to an electrical source.
Skip to 7:30.
(12-01-2011, 10:15 PM)zenmaster Wrote:(11-30-2011, 06:36 AM)Namaste Wrote: For one to label something 'untrue' directly implies you know everything.
They claim the toroid device is providing free energy, when it is not. One doesn't need to "know everything" in order to point out the obvious - that they're not providing some workable free-energy device or free-energy principle. We're not "blinded" by being ignorant of the toroid.
A magnetic field is a toroid shape. Big deal.
That's not the point. No one is an authority that can pronounce that 'it is obvious' that energy from a torus is untrue. It could well be true, just not part of the paradigms of science/understanding at this point in time.
Had Ra not mentioned the metaphysical time/space energy created by a pyramid (and not even a precision built object, simply four poles in the pyramid shape will suffice) was energetically beneficial, you would quite probably claim that as 'BS' if a living scientist or inventor was suggesting something similar :¬)