"Thrive" is amazing must watch!

[Namaste]

There is a fine line between indifference and compassion.

Wanting to help someone for the 'better' is part of third density; opening the heart. It's how you balance.

Questioner: I am going to make a statement and ask you to comment on its degree of accuracy. I am assuming that the balanced entity would not be swayed either towards positive or negative emotions by any situation which he might confront. By remaining unemotional in any situation, the balanced entity may clearly discern the appropriate and necessary responses in harmony with the Law of One for each situation. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is an incorrect application of the balancing which we have discussed. The exercise of first experiencing feelings and then consciously discovering their antitheses within the being has as its objective not the smooth flow of feelings both positive and negative while remaining unswayed but rather the objective of becoming unswayed. This is a simpler result and takes much practice, shall we say.

The catalyst of experience works in order for the learn/teachings of this density to occur. However, if there is seen in the being a response, even if it is simply observed, the entity is still using the catalyst for learn/teaching. The end result is that the catalyst is no longer needed. Thus this density is no longer needed. This is not indifference or objectivity but a finely tuned compassion and love which sees all things as love. This seeing elicits no response due to catalytic reactions. Thus the entity is now able to become co-Creator of experiential occurrences. This is the truer balance.

To choose indifference (and yet be intolerant to many people and their actions), and to tell one's self it's love/wisdom, is self delusion. One has to engage in these emotions in which to become truly balanced. Identifying with what one would deem 'better' for all is the keystone for service to others. From there one can truly balance, as Ra states above. Avoiding that choice by not wanting to 'label' is an incarnation wasted.

In my opinion, of course :¬)