"Thrive" is amazing must watch!

[zenmaster]

Identifying with what one would deem 'better' for all is the keystone for service to others.

Identifying like Hitler did?

Identification or belief in some idea or way itself does not necessarily have a basis in 'living from the heart'. Most often, it's in the form of an idea attachment which obviously promotes separation. I wonder how you would say such separation is a 'service to others'. As we know, sincerely believing that one is promoting their identifications in a positive manner, one that is 'service to others', may easily be as a road to hell paved with good intentions. Don't you think there's an important distinction between some belief seeming to be 'service to others' and something actually promoting that 'polarity'.

"The peoples of Maldek had a civilization somewhat similar to that of the societal complex known to you as Atlantis in that it gained much technological information and used it without care for the preservation of their sphere following to a majority extent the complex of thought, ideas, and actions which you may associate with your so-called negative polarity or the service to self. This was, however, for the most part, couched in a sincere belief/thought structure which seemed to the perception of the mind/body complexes of this sphere to be positive and of service to others."

Or Ghandi, Jesus, Mother Teresa, Tesla etc.

You seem to forget that third density is not the density of understanding, it's for experience.

Why do I seem to forget that? The idea of 3D not being a place for understanding is related to identification with some notion of knowing something as it is. Ra repeatedly suggests that one's mind and body be 'understood' in order to arrive at health and balance.

Our patterns of behavior are reinforced, opportunity for harmony and learning is provided by an 'understanding' - cultural, personal, etc. And there are certainly 'misunderstandings' which when eventually understood and accepted, remove 'blockages'.

The zealotry and exaggeration, applied to whatever cause, are often completely accepted as evidence of a 'positive' understanding, when in fact it's an indication of confused imbalance. Such a position is an example of lack of honesty and overextension of actual experience which is, of course, damaging. It should be obvious that conspiracy theories are spawned by compelling ideas of possibility (freedom, health, etc) which have been 'taken away' by some headless group. Social balance starts with individual balance, not with such ungrounded detachments.

Take away the experience, or action, and this density would lose it's value.

---

This density? there would then be no densities to evaluate.