"Thrive" is amazing must watch!

[Tenet Nosce]

But the suspicion is then not enough, a fabricated dynamic - a story, a rumor, is then created to paint a picture or 'frame' the separate, actual situation in such a way that my agenda gains more sympathy.

I'm curious to know if you would consider this following story a "fabricated dynamic". Particularly since you previously recommended for me to read it. Would you consider this all BS? Or?

An example of 'negative' influence. BS? To the extent that no backing info was provided. Fore knows this, of course.

I see. I must have not got to that part but... does Fore explain why this woman would take great pains to deceive him repeatedly over the course of 20-30 years. It just seems a little egocentric for him to think a being of her intelligence level would bother with him to such a degree.

You also didn't respond to the second part of my reply. No comment on how somebody like me might arrive at the same ideas this Pleiadian woman was offering. Perhaps they are abducting me and feeding me these same lies? What would be the purpose in that?

And what about the things that Fore was able to independently verify? Doesn't that give the woman any credibility on the rest? Or shouldn't people speak of anything unless they are carrying physical proof with them to back up their claims?

Maybe there is something later on which will change my perspective... but so far Fore seems to me like your garden-variety ego who thinks they are being "clever" by being dubious and mistrustful of others. Particularly those who are actually looking out for, and caring for him. Interesting psychology there.

I really don't understand what your perspective is on this. It would probably improve communication if you came out with it all at once rather than in bits and pieces. As you well know- offering your view in bits and pieces is going to result in the tendency of others to fill in the blanks with their own projections. That probably isn't a good thing for communication.

---

Wow.... I'm surprised that the film of this thread is judged on a basis of a deep life-changer for the public. If it was analysed by this standard, then a person "under any film spell" might latch on to TV or upon nearly any whim. I thought of it merely as a potential ice breaker or after burner. To contrast systems as they are with systems purportedly made a little more free.... There are plenty of energy conserving systems ignored and pushed away from markets. Yes the film is too much work for the lazy. There are many repressed systems which could improve life, but instead are unpleasantly destroyed or lazily ignored. Or perhaps real effort is plain shunned. I favor exposures of competing paradigms-of-possibilities which compare alternatives to the currently failing paradigm. In this case it somewhat challenges the failing promises of golden parachutes or false laurels promised for old age. It's just a little heads up, to take a walk around the block. To see what can been seen.

Yes, I was surprised as well. I didn't see anybody in this thread claiming that the "Thrive Movement" was going to change the world. Yet some seem to be arguing against it that way.

Interestingly, I have seen zenmaster forward arguments that movies like this are basically ineffectual, then later claims that they are actually harmful to society and slow the process of true spiritual growth. It seems to me like it would be one or the other, but not both.

At any rate... considering how many Americans will spend the most of today watching large men in colored tights chase a pig skin around a large field of grass while surrounded by tens of thousands of screaming idiots... I have a really hard time seeing how movies like "Thrive!" are the REAL problem as far as society goes.