12-11-2011, 03:02 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-11-2011, 03:03 PM by Tenet Nosce.)
(11-26-2011, 02:37 AM)zenmaster Wrote: Not surprising. As predicted, they tried to check for errors in the measurement accuracy.
Um... maybe you didn't read the article? It says they actually confirmed the measurements.
As you may recall, your prognostication on this finding was that it was false due to:
zenmaster Wrote:Experimental error, most likely. For example, bad calculation of distance.