12-12-2011, 02:56 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-12-2011, 02:57 PM by Tenet Nosce.)
(12-12-2011, 01:43 AM)zenmaster Wrote:(12-11-2011, 09:16 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:It appears that much of his learning was not self-determined, or seeded from this 'experiential nexus'. For example, the 'advisor' would change things in his mind, as he slept, apparently. The stories, the training. But then again, as Ra said, they commonly 'get away' with programming people for their use, so there would seem to be some kind of mutual exchange involved. He may very well be part of the 'new breed' and therefore have different balancing concerns.Quote:How could such a special situation be allowed when it seems like a free-will abridgment?Why do you say that it seems like a free-will abridgement?
Interesting. I know I used to rail against the idea of "soul contracts" especially with respect to contact/abduction scenarios. I figured it was just some BS used to get people to accept this sort of thing. But my views have been changing on that. Much due to the book by Dolores Cannon I referenced above.
Well I guess it probably won't be of much further use to talk about Fore's experiences without his own personal input! But just based on what he shared about his pre-incarnative experiences as well as how differently things look to one when they are not limited by this clunky 3D mind we have- I wonder if he didn't in fact agree to all of this beforehand.
I could see myself in a similar pre-incarnative scenario being a bit overconfident in what I thought I could handle. Like taking an attitude that says "Bring it on!" not fully realizing how dense physicality on earth can be. Then getting here and going- "Oh crap. I don't remember signing up for this!"