The L/L Meditation Pyramid

[Namaste]

Dear Namaste,

Here is a photo of Carla in the center of the pyramid that the L/L group constructed in the back yard of the house where most of the Ra Contact took place.



The rods were eight feet in length, and the pyramid consisted of equilateral triangles.

And while we're on the subject...

Does anyone know how to cut wood beams to size so that an equilateral pyramid can be assembled and disassembled? Say, as this person mentions here in Post #24: http://www.bring4th.org/forums/showthrea...2#pid22632.

My square home does not funnel the energy as needed. I can't tell you how many people I have over my place who are like, "Dude, the energy is so not funneled here. You have rectangular and square'ish rooms."

Thus does enlightenment elude me.

Seriously interested if anyone can do this or can help me to do this.

Love/Light, GLB

Thank you GLB, very - very - much appreciated.

I'll be attempting to build a simple version of this pyramid, I have a friend who is a carpenter, he may have some ideas/ If he does, I'll be sure to share them with you.

The thing that confuses me (for the small energising pyramid for under pillow) is this:

"The total of the four base sides is 1.16 times the height"

That creates a very - very - sharp/pointed pyramid. I wonder if there was an error in transmission.

I think Ra was ignoring Don's misunderstanding and giving the proportion as originally described. Take half a base side, multiply by 1.16 and that's the height.

Hmmmm. It seems Ra's words (not Don's clarification) is very much open to various interpretations.

Ra: I am Ra. It matters not. Only the proportion of the height of the pyramid from base to apex to the perimeter of the base is at all important.

Deconstructing:

1. Only the proportion of the height of the pyramid
2. from base to apex
3. to the perimeter of the base

It seems clear that the first variable is height, and that the second is it's perimeter. The perimeter of a pyramid is a simple variable, used often in mathematics. I very much doubt Ra would use the incorrect terminology.

Saying that, it does create an unusually tall and thin pyramid.

I wonder if Ra meant 1.61, instead of 1.16? Closer to the golden ratio.

Edit: Can't be that either, it yields a slope of 78.5º.

Think I'll stick with an equilateral triangle, such as L/L's :¬)