Polarity vs. Orientation

[zenmaster]

Apologies for the incomprehension zen, I'm also curious about this. I believe what you are essentially saying is that it isn't necessarily impossible to discern the orientation of an action but rather the magnitude of the polarity of an action?

Was just saying that it's possible to determine service orientation because that is the personality (rays and all that).

Determining a negative or positive act as far as polarity (use of) is not possible because inward and outward are indistinguishable (as far as resulting work accomplished). And that is not 'negative' or 'positive' with respect to ethical principles, which would be service orientation. Nothing to do with magnitudes.

---

I think polarization only has meaning with respect to service orientation. That is, the natural or ethical foundation provided by the logos has two paths only. As Ra said, it's not possible to not serve the creator. That service, as the greater view is discovered (i.e. ethical principles) naturally results in some general attitude of what constitutes appropriate action or fulfillment. To 'absorb' or to 'radiate'.

Then I'm still confused about the point you're making. It would seem that it's not possible, in this density at least, to serve self or others without polarizing or to polarize without choosing to serve in one way or the other.

Or do you mean that it's possible to stay at a certain comfortable level of service without polarizing further?

My answer to your question was 'no' - it's not possible, and I was attempting to explain why. It's definitely possible to not polarize or to depolarize.