04-03-2012, 10:39 PM
(04-03-2012, 10:32 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:(04-03-2012, 10:22 PM)Shemaya Wrote:(04-03-2012, 10:17 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: 1. Did 'Gaia' mean humans eating animals in the way the Native Americans did? Only the extent necessary for survival? Or did 'Gaia' mean bacon for breakfast, hamburger for lunch, and chicken for dinner? With no connection at all to the animals that were killed...?
Don't know, You'll have to use your own discernment on that one.
(04-03-2012, 10:17 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: 2. Being that most of the meat consumed comes from torturous slaughterhouse conditions, was any distinction made when this question was asked of 'Gaia?'
No it was not
Well I find it a bit odd that that question wasn't asked. You said "lots" of people channel Gaia and they all say "the same thing" that eating animals is ok. How many of these channels eat meat? All of them, perchance?
(04-03-2012, 10:22 PM)Shemaya Wrote: Individual bias always adds distortion , imo. That's why you just take what moves you, what opens you up, and what resonates, and leave the rest.
Then, in that case, would you agree that it's possible that, if the person channeling eats animals, then the information might be distorted/biased in favor of "Gaia thinks it's ok for humans to eat animals" ?
I haven't asked them what they eat...I don't recall saying "lots" of channels saying this. One that I know personally, another that I read on another occasion. I think any channel can be distorted, probably safe to say that all channeling is distorted or biased to some degree.
Why are you so curious about what I have to say about Gaia? If its not resonating with you, it shouldn't matter, then again I do have a Gaia vibe I've been told, whatever that is
