1973.08.x - Hatonn & Oxal

[artichoke]

... As you have recently stated, time and space are dependent, one upon another. It has also been stated that they are totally independent, and have no relationship. Both of these statements are true. It simply depends on your point of view. The people of your planet at present do not appreciate the number of dimensions that are available for one to experience the creation. All of these dimensions are made up of a single place and a single time, and, for that matter, a single dimension, which has no dimension. But it is necessary to go from where you are to where you will be.

I guess if you consider all locations in (space x time) to be orthogonal, then each is its own dimension and one can move backward, forward, around, etc. not being constrained by what we experience as velocity, acceleration, viscosity, inertia, etc.

If you do not have the viewpoint (outside of "space" and "time") for that, then more things are linked (not orthogonal) and one thing depends on the other.

... The relationship between the two is the third power [of] displacement in either. This may be recognized by a simple equation or formula. There are three dimensions: therefore, the numeral “3” is used, both as a power and as a constant. T3 divided by 3 is equal to S3. S3 divided by 3 is equal to T.

This cannot be taken literally in our environment. One could solve the two equations simultaneously to find T = plus or minus 3, which makes no sense.

Your present constant, that which you call the velocity of light, is the basic speed of the field. The permeability of that which you know as matter is dependent upon this constant. In other words, my friends, the densities of which your world is composed, and the densities of the other planes of existence as you know them, are time-dependent. Their permeability is a function of apparent speed.

There is the relationship from electromagnetic wave theory (e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagn...e_equation )

c = 1 / sqrt(epsilon mu)

where c is the speed of light and mu is called the magnetic permeability ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permeabilit...gnetism%29 ) . epsilon is correspondingly called the electric permittivity.

mu and epsilon are dependent on the material or medium. They have values (not zero or infinity) in 3-D "free space" as well. The speed of light is different in free space or in air or in glass. Perhaps mu, and maybe also epsilon, are what they mean by permeability.

Space may be thought of as linear, if time is thought of as volumetric. Or you may reverse the process, as you do within your limitation, and consider space volumetric and time linear. Either is true. And either may be perceived to be true, depending upon the limitations of your thought. It is possible to move linearly in space and volumetrically in time, all with the same movement. You can be aware of what you call the past, the present, and the future, simultaneously.

So they seem to say that past can be seen as a dimension, present as a dimension, future as a dimension. But we're stuck seeing only the present and cannot control our progress in it. We can remember some of the past and cannot see the future. I read elsewhere, maybe Ra, that in time/space time is volumetric and space is linear. (Here in space/time, space is volumetric and time is linear.) In time/space one can move about in time but not in space. That might be why "ghosts" inhabit a fixed location, like a "haunted house". They can move in time but not (or at least not voluntarily) in space.

I think that as far as it goes, this agrees with ayadew's interpretation.