04-06-2012, 11:09 AM
(04-06-2012, 12:11 AM)Bring4th_Austin Wrote: I think the major thing to realize from this quote is that anger itself does not cause cancer...it is ignoring the anger and not using it as catalyst to polarize. If the anger is examined and accepted (not viewed as folly), there is no need to offer the catalyst to the body.
What I've wondered about is the time-frame of this. How long does one have to use the catalyst before it becomes physical?
Quote:But anger is not folly...it is either something to be accepted (STO) or controlled (STS), otherwise it may spread as catalyst to the body.
I struggle with understanding this breakdown, though I see where they are coming from. I grew up trying to control anger because I didn't want to hurt anybody with it. How would that fit into the polarization scale?