1973.08.x - Hatonn & Oxal

[ayadew]

Hello all. Thank you for your comments and appreciation of the subject.
Perhaps I should refine my model.

I may not be sure what you mean by that sentence. Somehow there's enough agreement that we all agree on physicality. If I'm going to drive into a ditch, my wife next to me can see the same ditch and tell me to avoid it. It seems quite inefficient to tell us all a story simultaneously, keeping everything synchronized, rather than just allowing physicality to exist under our 3D physical rules. Occam's razor and all that.

In this reality we exist on the same linear plane that is time. Another plane of time would be a different reality, because the physical environment is bound to the linear time.
Each moment in linear time is bound to a specific physical 'happening' which we percieve.

Likewise in space-time S^3 x T, by moving in space one cannot affect the movement of time. Except perhaps for relativistic effects (time in an accelerating frame slows down as perceived from a non-accelerating frame.)

I am ayadew. This is correct. ()

Can you move backwards or stand still? Bigger question: why in the one-dimensional view can one not control the movement in the one dimension?

You can move backwards or stand still. The problem is that we do not normally, for some reason we move in time at a set pace.
Remember though, this is our brain's interpretation. You can manipulate this through drugs, meditation techniques etc. You can with them go back in time or to future. You can speed up or slow down time. You can also move to another linear time, ie: possible outcomes, possible future.

Can you perceive only a moment of X from each moment in Y? Or can you see all of X from the vantage point of any moment in Y? And the question from above, repeated: why in the two-dimensional view can one not control the movement in the two dimensions?

In this realm, 2D Time/1D Physical, you would see all possible simultaneous linear times, but subjectively (Y). See it as a specific mentality towards the infinity of simultaneous realities. You can only have one at a time. See is as observing 1 version of linear time's future/past/present simultaneously.
I cannot picture this reality in words or imagination, so it's hard to describe. In 3D Time/1D physical you'd see all time objectively (Z). This is only metaphor.

But here you do have control. Why in the three-dimensional view can one control the movement in the three dimensions?

From Z (3D time) you can control all linear times simultaneously, moving forward through all times at the same... time. You see all time that ever existed unfolding simultaneously. Thus you ARE time. In this reality, we ARE physical. Do not attempt to compare time to physical though. They are fundamentally different.

This is more easily pictured. This is 'ultimate' control of time. It's objective time, not subjective.

I may not understand your model. To me, the difficulty would come in T2: what is two-dimensional time. As for four dimensions T^3 x S, we are used to four dimensions S^3 x T and there would be some analogy. T^2 x S seems just as unfamiliar to me as T^3 x S .

In our reality, there is no 4th dimension. In physical reality, see time as a dimension that is not part of the 3D physical. It is not accumulative. See instead, as described above, the physical dimension bound to the time dimension. Not that time is another dimension inside/part of the physical dimension number of dimension.



In 4th density, we will be 6th dimensional beings. We will be physical and time. Thus time as we see it now becomes unimportant. We become timeless. Time and it's infinite variations in possible past/future/present becomes a plaything of the self. We become that which underlies this reality, more dense with light. This makes fundamental sense to me.
It stretches your mind to imagine what dimensions higher density (5+) entities exists in. Thus look forward to some intellectual orgasms in 4th density.