In regards to eating meat

[Tenet Nosce]

TN, why do you say that the doctrine of ahimsa and karman are cunning programs inserted into consciousness by the controllers? Hopefully I am interpreting what you said correctly, this may be a subtopic but it does seem relevant to this extensive discussion.

Thanks for your question! The answer is: part research, part intuition, and part memory. So this would classify as mostly speculation.

As for the research portion, it is based on the timeline given in the Ra material for negative manipulation of humanity. One of the things which I saw in my research the promulgation of dietary law during these time periods. When I traced the philosophical underpinnings of dietary law back through the last 5000 years of recorded history, I found they were rooted in the concepts of ahimsa and karman as developed in the Vedic cultures.

There is a fairly abrupt and severe drop off in historical records before this time. Curiously enough, the time frame given by Ra for when they physically walked upon the earth and helped to build the pyramids ends right before where the historical record picks up. I speculate this is because the record was deliberately scrubbed.

Beyond this point in time I have even less evidence to go on. So this is about 99% intuition and memory... but it appears that in the time of Ra there was some time of special food substance that was being produced or manufactured. Knowledge of this has come down to us in stories of the mythical foods like soma, ambrosia, nectar of the gods, or the forbidden fruit.

In the smallest of nutshells, I suspect that ahimsa and karman were manipulated in order to control who had access to the "forbidden fruit" after the departure of our 6D friends.

I mean- who doesn't want to be harmless? Do any of us want to cause harm to others? As for me, I took an oath to First Do No Harm. But I take that oath seriously enough to consider what that really means. Is it even possible to do no harm? Or are we each to do what we feel is the minimum harm, based upon what we each individually determine based upon our awareness and experience?

Is there really some absolute standard by which we could measure harmlessness? If there were... would we really want to know what that was? If a "magical" food were available tomorrow, how would we decide who gets it, and who doesn't? Based on who is the most "harmless" or the most "pure"? These are the sorts of questions which come to my mind when I think of this.