In regards to eating meat

[Shemaya]

I think this is the reason for all you may find contrary in this thread. We can't change people. We aren't allowed to. It's free will. Besides that, evolution doesn't happen from a want. It happens from a need. Our collective simply hasn't reached the need to change ways right now. We all impact the future in our own unique way. A critical mass may be coming, but it isn't here, so we shouldn't pretend it is here. This 3D thing has its way of operating. 4D is a world of a different color.

This is where our opinions differ. I don't see 4D as something that happens 'to' us but something we attract, based on our vibrations.

From what I understand, 4d will come in it's right time to planet Earth, like the striking of a clock at midnight. Are you talking about Ra's teaching on Harvest and Q' uo's description of the steps of light? Do you believe you have attracted 4d to yourself because of your higher vibration?

One of my favorite quotes, by Aldous Huxley:


Personification in politics is an error which we make because it is to our advantage as egotists to be able to feel violently proud of our country and of ourselves as belonging to it, and to believe that all the misfortunes due to our own mistakes are really the work of the Foreigner. It is easier to feel violently toward a person than toward an abstraction; hence our habit of making political personifications. In some cases military personifications are merely special instances of political personifications. A particular collectivity, the army or the warring nation, is given the name and, along with the name, the attributes of a single person, in order that we may be able to love or hate it more intensely than we could do if we thought of it as what it really is: a number of diverse individuals. In other cases personification is used for the purpose of concealing the fundamental absurdity and monstrosity of war. What is absurd and monstrous about war is that men who have no personal quarrel should be trained to murder one another in cold blood. By personifying opposing armies or countries, we are able to think of war as a conflict between individuals. The same result is obtained by writing about war as though it were carried on exclusively by the generals in command and not by the private soldiers in their armies. (“Rennenkampf had pressed back von Schubert.”) The implication in both cases is that war is indistinguishable from a bout of fisticuffs in a bar room. Whereas in reality it is profoundly different. A scrap between two individuals is forgivable; mass murder, deliberately organized, is a monstrous iniquity. We still choose war as an instrument of policy; and to comprehend the full wickedness and absurdity of war would therefore be inconvenient. For, once we understood, we should have to make some effort to get rid of the abominable thing.

Complete quote: http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/2011/07/...ty-of-war/


[/quote]
Are you saying eating meat is akin to mass murder and war ? Is a farmer who has humanely raised his livestock for food guilty of murder and war against animals?