In regards to eating meat

[Monica]

I've already said that is an entirely separate topic. That is carrying a separate argument into a discussion about eating. The reason being that there is no end to that reasoning, which makes no one outside.

That's just it. They can't be separated. In order for me to eat your dog (as you suggested would be ok) I would first have to kill the dog.

Trying to separate eating meat from the killing of the animal, is disassociation. One cannot eat meat unless someone kills the animal.

---

However, a negatively oriented entity may choose a painful condition in order to improve the distortion toward the so-called negative emotive mentations such as anger, hatred, and frustration. Such an entity may use an entire incarnative experience honing a blunt edge of hatred or anger so that it may polarize more towards the negative or separated pole.

I don't see the relevance. Ra is talking about something entirely different.

[quote='3DMonkey' pid='83085' dateline='1335413309']

Ra: I am Ra. We perceive that we have not been able to clarify your service versus its desire for service. You need, in our humble opinion, to look at the humor of the situation and relinquish your desire to serve where no service is requested.

Again, how is this relevant? Being that the animals are obviously requesting service, by crying out for help and wailing in agony.