04-30-2012, 02:38 PM
(04-30-2012, 02:26 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:(04-30-2012, 08:25 AM)Valtor Wrote: Not more evolved, simply not veiled. 2d beings are not veiled and so can communicate psychically.
Ah, but then why don't dogs, cats and cows communicate psychically?
I think we're close to resolving this. Stay with me here, please.
What do we know?
1. Plants communicate psychically with one another.
2. Higher 2D entities (cows, chickens, dogs, cats, etc.) don't.
Why might that be?
If, as some of the meat-eaters say, all 2D entities are basically the same, then if they can communicate psychically because they're not veiled, then it would logically follow that all unveiled 2D entities would have that ability.
But they don't. If they did - if animals had that same ability - then cows would in a constant frenzy, sensing all the death around them.
But they aren't. Cows are, as they say, 'contented' until they walk up the plank to the executioner, and smell the stench of death around them. Only then do they get worked up and become terrified.
The evidence showing that plants warn other plants of impending danger is being used to support the argument that plants are just as sentient as animals. But I think it actually supports the opposite argument: that they are able to send psychic signals because they are all part of a single organism, a single group consciousness.
Whereas, the very fact that animals don't do that, is indicative of them being individuated.
In addition, 2D is a very long density. It's unreasonable to assume that entities don't progress at all, during that whole time, but are all the same. In my view, it's much more reasonable to think that entities do indeed progress, and choose physical vehicles according to their level of consciousness. An entity whose consciousness is beginning to become individuated, would be more likely to incarnate into a body capable of movement.
There is some intelligence to the design of physical vehicles. Plants don't need motility because they aren't individuated. And the evidence of them communicating with one another strongly supports my assertion that they have a group consciousness, rather than being individually sentient.
But I do believe that animals communicate in the same way plants do. Sounds for them is just adding to this, like body language is for us.
Animals do not worry about being killed in the future, simply because they live in the NOW.
Humans are also much better off when living in the now. Worrying about the future is part of our "insanity".