04-30-2012, 07:41 PM
(04-30-2012, 07:17 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:(04-30-2012, 07:04 PM)Valtor Wrote:(04-30-2012, 06:43 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: I find this amazing. Let's try this with humans substituted:
I feel a lot of subtle judgments on both sides of the argument and I seriously believe that this brings more negativity to Earth than killing innocent children in wars ever could.
The killing of innocent children in wars comes directly from the act of judgment. Without judgment, there is acceptance. With acceptance there are no disagreements. And without disagreements there are no wars.
OK, but your statement was that judgment was more harmful than the actual killing. When applied to humans, does that still hold true?
It seems obvious in the answer, judgement as the source of killing. Yes, judgement is where the harm starts.
My opinion on this is that judgement is catalyst for the mind, whereas eating is catalyst for the body.