In regards to eating meat

[Patrick]

Not really no. Inuits did get some carbs in their diet. This comes from the research I have done on the subject AND from personally knowing people who eat only animals and has been for years. Their diet is (by calories) 80% animal fat and 20% animal protein. They only get traces of carbs from eating liver.

Are you 100% certain they ate NO plant foods whatsoever? Sorry for my doubt, but if canned beans can be mistaken for raw veggies, then an occasional fruit or veggie might get missed too. Seriously no offense intended, but it is a valid question, being that you are making a pretty fantastic claim here.

Yes I'm certain and I can understand your skepticism.

If you'd like to ask them for yourself, you could always go to their forum: http://forum.zeroinginonhealth.com/index.php

I cannot and do not want to decide what is wrong for them.

By the logic you and others are presenting, the next time someone hears a woman screaming in a dark alley, we should just look the other way. We shouldn't bother trying to save her, or trying to reason with the would-be murderer/rapist, because "who are we to decide what is wrong for them?"

After all, if we decide that the attacker is doing something 'wrong' then that's judging him, right? And that would be worse than his act of violence!

So we can't judge the attacker, because that would be STS. So we shouldn't try to impose our views of right and wrong on him, because that would be STS. So we should just ignore the call for help from the woman, and just not interfere, and not even call 911 either. After all, who are we to judge?

Before I answer this, I would like to note that without judgment there would be no attacker in the first place. There would be no STS either. 3d catalysts would be extremely mellow and 3d would take a very long time.

I am not saying that judging is wrong, because I believe that nothing is wrong. I am simply explaining how things works from my current perspective. I would normally not even do so, but you asked me in the beginning to explain myself, because leaving misunderstandings would be irresponsible.

Now to answer this.

I see a difference in between imposing my views of right and wrong on the attacker and helping the person who is asking for my help.

"After all, if we decide that the attacker is doing something 'wrong' then that's judging him, right? And that would be worse than his act of violence!"

Yes but only for your self. His act of violence does not have to result in negativity to you. But imposing your judgment on him does result in negativity to you AND does not change anything regarding his act. It's not helping one bit.

The person in need of help would get my help. And in so doing, I would indeed try to stop the would-be murderer/rapist.

I am not nearly balanced enough to simply watch this while only feeling compassion for both.

IMHO it's a very small minority of criminals that are STS. Most criminals are themselves asking for our help. They just don't know how to express this with other ways than violence. Those truly "happy" with their lot are probably the STS ones.

I understand that this is really starting to get off topic. So before the moderators gets involved, I will try to get back on topic.