(05-01-2012, 07:58 PM)Diana Wrote: Right. But Ra didn't say that we are to just do nothing, and let someone attack us or our family. Responding with love is not the same as doing nothing and letting everything be. For one thing, there is the respect for the physical body which houses our consciousness, and which we are caretakers of.
Actually, they did imply that in higher densities that's exactly what we'd do.
Quote:33.11 Questioner: This motion picture brought out this point of which we have been talking. And the entity, the Colonel, had to make a decision at that point. I was just wondering, with respect to polarity, his polarization. He could have either knuckled under, you might say, to the negative forces, but he chose to defend his friend instead. Is it possible for you to estimate which is more positively polarizing: to defend the positively oriented entity, or to allow the suppression by the negatively oriented entities? Can you answer this even?
Ra: I am Ra. This question takes in the scope of fourth density as well as your own and its answer may best be seen by the action of the entity called Jehoshuah, which you call Jesus. This entity was to be defended by its friends. The entity reminded its friends to put away the sword. This entity then delivered itself to be put to the physical death. The impulse to protect the loved other-self is one which persists through the fourth density, a density abounding in compassion. More than this we cannot and need not say.
(05-01-2012, 08:39 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: Trying to change society is yellow ray. Having compassion for animals, and answering their call, is green ray.
Trying to change society in order that animals be better treated is yellow ray, but there's nothing wrong with that.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)