05-02-2012, 12:52 AM
(05-01-2012, 06:01 PM)Valtor Wrote: The person in need of help would get my help. And in so doing, I would indeed try to stop the would-be murderer/rapist.
I am not nearly balanced enough to simply watch this while only feeling compassion for both.
I see this as a misconception by a few here..........
42.7 Questioner: I would like to try to make an analogy for third-density of this concept. Many entities here feel great compassion for relieving the physical problems of third-density other-selves by administering to them in many ways, with food if there is hunger as there is now in the African nations, by bringing them medicine if they feel that there is a need to minister to them medically, and being selfless in all of these services to a very great extent.
This is creating a vibration that is in harmony with green-ray or fourth-density but it is not balanced with the understanding of fifth-density that these entities are experiencing catalysts and a more balanced administration to their needs would be to provide them with the learning necessary to reach the state of awareness of fourth-density than it would be to minister to their physical needs at this time. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. To a mind/body/spirit complex which is starving, the appropriate response is the feeding of the body. You may extrapolate from this.
On the other hand, however, you are correct in your assumption that the green ray response is not as refined as that which has been imbued with wisdom. This wisdom enables the entity to appreciate its contributions to the planetary consciousness by the quality of its being without regard to activity or behavior which expects results upon visible planes.
You know that those unseen that bring the reality to us that we demand are always wishing that we would make the right choices. A choice is an action. There is no balance in indifference. There can be decisions made on a balanced perception. Perceiving all of the background construction that went into the action in the moment. What it boils down to is the description of an informed choice.
While writing this insight was just given to me about green ray activation. Polarization is even easier than I thought.
(05-01-2012, 09:50 PM)Valtor Wrote: Incidentally, has any activism ever been shown to actually help promote their cause in the collective? By this I mean getting actual results in what the cause is about.
EDIT:
I guess this answers my question.
http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/07Anderson.html
Quote:Activism has played a major role in ending slavery, challenging dictatorships, protecting workers from exploitation, protecting the environment, promoting equality for women, opposing racism, and many other important issues. Activism can also be used for aims such as attacking minorities or promoting war.
This made me laugh pretty hard when I got home and read it.
(05-01-2012, 05:16 PM)Valtor Wrote: Do you believe you are contributing to slavery by using money? Probably not, because that is probably not your intent. In the same way you can eat meat without the intent to contribute to animal abuse.
I am definitely contributing to slavery. I am also trying to change my ways, knowing that I cannot change the collective in this instance. One benefit is that there are many others that are coming to the same understanding, and many are coming together. Possibly forming a new social complex. I find it beneficial to not accept the failing social complex of modern ways.
(05-01-2012, 05:37 PM)Diana Wrote: The money is inert, and does respond to intention in your life.
Get more into the "magic" and you will find that it is not "inert". It definitely has an effect just touching us. Just consider the recent rush to pull old money out of the system in order to replace it with new money. New graphics. There is a hidden connection just like there are hidden connections all around us, similar to TV and the web.
(05-01-2012, 05:22 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: Retreating within and saying "it's OK" would seem to be included in that it would lighten the planetary consciousness.
If by "lighter" you mean less mass, then I would agree. Removing consciousness would be an analog for "lighten". Consciousness does not evolve by removing yourself, unless of course it is your self that is holding back evolution LMAO!