The act of eating is a service.

[Diana]

I agree. Positing that ALL is evolving, then would you say the choices we make have an impact on evolution in general, even evolution of ALL?

All of our interactions have an impact on evolution, including of course our choices. All the impacts it has, even just breathing air, are not possible for us to know. This density is not of knowing, even subjectively. This IMHO is important to grasp. The purpose of 3d is not of knowing, but of testing the strength of your acceptance or the strength of your resolve to control. Of course, wanderers have other reasons to be here.

And do you think, since ALL is evolving, that even the densities are not static, and subject to evolution, or at least, change?

Yes, before entities were complex, the nature of the densities was the same as it is now, but their purpose has since evolved somewhat. The Logoi experiences and this experience becomes their harvest and their nature.

Okay. So if all choices have an impact on evolution, and even the densities themselves evolve, then it is reasonable to assume that choices have an impact on the evolution of densities.

The two paths you mention above--acceptance and control--are fairly simple. But I think there is more to it than that. There is evolution to consider. Let's take the idea of eating to demonstrate:

An individual can look out at this world and see that food is provided in certain ways, meat from factory farms for example, and accept that it is done so.

Or, one can see factory farms and understand out of compassion that they are cruel, and seek to control the situation by becoming an activist.

I see a 3rd scenario. An individual can look at the factory farms, decide he/she does not want to participate or contribute to them out of compassion, and seek to actively participate in the evolution of humans and food by envisioning something better. The envisioning could include sharing information with no attachment to outcome, yet still holding the vision. By choosing to hold a vision one contributes to evolution.

We can be passive observers in this game of life, and that's fine. We can vibrate with life and vision and participation (as those of Ra did by answering a call), and create big vibrations for "the creator." This is hard for me to put into words. But I do see a difference between passivity and purpose. Purpose does not equal control, necessarily, and passivity does not equal acceptance necessarily.

I think our choices do matter in how and what we eat. They matter beyond our service to self in nourishing our bodies. Choices that contribute to a better future aren't necessary; things can be "all is well" as they are; but not for me. And I don't see it as control, I see it as evolution.