The act of eating is a service.

[TheFifty9Sound]

Exactly. We are all responsible for defining our own realities.

So do you think we can redefine the criteria of graduation to 4D?

When you say the word "criteria", it brings to my mind the concept of.. a checklist. And my understanding is it doesn't work quite like that.

The concept of right and wrong, as I said earlier is all relative to our values and morals. Right and wrong is not a tangible thing. Our actions can thrown into either category depending on the viewpoint of the individual. However, it is only the intention of the individual performing that action that counts towards their graduation to 4D.

For example, a patient might be critically ill with cancer, and very much desire euthanasia. One doctor might accept these demands out of compassion and put the patent out of his misery. In giving the patient the most dignified possible death for himself and his family, he has chalked up a STO act and taken steps towards being harvestable.

Another doctor might accept these same demands, but without any compassion in his heart, but instead thinking "He's going to die anyway, it'll shorten my rounds. I won't have to worry about him anymore", and is more concerned with the mechanics of having the patient gone, and making his own life easier.

Both doctors could theoretically take the same action on the same patient, but it depends on what is in their hearts as to whether or not it will get them any closer to being harvestable to 4D.

This is how I see it.