06-02-2012, 08:27 PM
(06-02-2012, 05:47 PM)omcasey Wrote: Why would you say this?
It is not implied in any way in what I have put through.
Misinterpretations are part of the learning process, don't take anything I say personally.

(06-02-2012, 05:47 PM)omcasey Wrote: it is first a matter of recognizing whether there is a sufficient opening/immediate need in the other self to receive new-and-certain information.
When I was young I came to understand my position as a "karma" worker. Or "programmer", whichever sounds best.
When it is time to update perception we will connect with someone that hands us a different level/angle of perception. Not understanding, misinterpreting, ignoring, or refusing, etc, all activate a level of negative energy for us. We call it catalyst or karma. When we are ready we bump into these people. When we are to update others it is not fully our choice to decide whether they are ready or not. They made the connection, they made the choice. I am sure you are aware of the human ability to "zone out" or space off anything you have no interest in? That is like the safety margin for those "not ready". Different from consciously ignoring. I think most are not aware of their position as a programmer, while those at the top are fully aware, and not very subtle about it. They consider "us" animals.
So if I ramble on about anything and someone gets involved, one of us or both of us may have something for the other. In my case it can take up to two months before I "get" the new perception, and in the meantime I may be turning away all sorts of negatives that are trying to force me into action. Not always a "positive" action of course. Many of us tend to notice the negative influences more than the positive influences, and so positive messages can slip past and we only catch a wave of negative in its backdraft.
My user pic jokingly represents my position doling out catalyst programming. I tend to enjoy myself, but I walk a fine line between sarcasm(positive) and mocking(negative).
