06-05-2012, 09:08 AM
(06-05-2012, 04:03 AM)TheFifty9Sound Wrote: All life would be removed.
That is the problem, if I may use that term. Life cannot be "removed." Life is all there is. What you are expressing is actually the dissolution of the physical vehicles of the entities upon this planet. And even the matter (which is nothing more than light) which made these physical isn't truly "lost." Nothing is lost, really.
Quote:it will be an extremely difficult process for the souls of earth to continue their spiritual journey, one, because they have no earth,
There are more planets/Earths than just one.
Quote:and two they'll become tangled in a knot of fear such as those from Maldek did.
But this is their experience; the result of their choices! When will one draw the line between interfering too much with another planetary evolution and when not? That is the question.
Quote:So, what does John do? John puts a stop to group A. Freezes them in time. Or zaps them off the planet. Or turns them into earthworms
Now that sounds an awful lot like an StS entiti(es) would do. Are you certain this John is a StO 5/6D entity..?
Quote:So then, would John then regain that polarity instantly, as it was a selfless service to others?
Selfless service, or... selfish service?
(06-05-2012, 08:43 AM)TheFifty9Sound Wrote: the point I wish to discuss is the intentional infringement on free will out of love and how that affects polarity - in any instance .
To infringe on free will, specially intentionally, will, in my understanding, decrease positive polarization and increase negative.
The two forms of service, so called positive and negative, revolve around the concept of free-will. One allows, accepts and respects the expression of free-will to experience the greatest of freedoms (by allowing the free-will of others to be freely expressed—after all, "they are us and we are them"), and thus sees the responsibility to "protect" other-selves from having their free-wills infringed/violated; whereas the other seeks to inhibit, control and suppress the freewill of other-selves to experience a greater free-will itself at the expense of the latter (i.e. power differential).