Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing...

Bring4th Forums

Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

Thread: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing...

Monica (Offline)

Account Closed

Posts: 7,043
Threads: 151
Joined: Dec 2008

#5

01-07-2010, 01:28 AM

In addition to the excellent replies already given, I personally find the Law of One work to have less distortion than most of the other channeled works out there. Could be a clue, perhaps?

Also, the Q'uo sessions seem to be much more about practical applications of the Law of One, whereas the Ra sessions contained a vast body of technical data.

[+]

2 members thanked Monica for this post

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)

Messages In This Thread

Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by kristy1111 - 01-06-2010, 03:15 AM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by Questioner - 01-06-2010, 03:49 AM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by thefool - 01-06-2010, 07:22 PM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by Peregrinus - 01-07-2010, 12:27 AM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by Monica - 01-07-2010, 01:28 AM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by Ashim - 01-07-2010, 09:00 AM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by Phoenix - 01-07-2010, 02:22 AM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by Peregrinus - 01-07-2010, 04:39 AM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by Peregrinus - 01-08-2010, 12:23 AM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by Ashim - 01-08-2010, 04:51 AM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by fairyfarmgirl - 01-11-2010, 04:01 PM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by Sacred Fool - 01-11-2010, 04:22 AM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by kristy1111 - 01-16-2010, 07:48 PM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by Sacred Fool - 01-18-2010, 01:53 AM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by AnthroHeart - 02-09-2010, 06:43 PM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by Sacred Fool - 02-09-2010, 11:47 PM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by AppleSeed - 02-10-2010, 11:37 AM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by AnthroHeart - 02-11-2010, 10:22 AM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by litllady - 02-11-2010, 11:31 AM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by Plenum - 07-08-2012, 10:41 AM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by Patrick - 07-08-2012, 10:08 PM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by LetGo - 07-09-2012, 10:01 AM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by kdsii - 07-09-2012, 12:19 PM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by Patrick - 07-09-2012, 02:09 PM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by kdsii - 07-09-2012, 02:24 PM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by Patrick - 07-09-2012, 02:32 PM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by kdsii - 07-09-2012, 02:42 PM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by Patrick - 07-09-2012, 02:49 PM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by Plenum - 07-09-2012, 05:02 PM

RE: Precise tuning required for channeling, vs. pretty much nothing... - by kdsii - 07-09-2012, 05:13 PM