07-08-2012, 02:46 PM
(07-08-2012, 12:07 PM)ShinAr Wrote: For such to be possible there would have to be alternate timelines and parallel realities where all of the various options are played out so that whatever choice one makes, can be realized in such inclusion somewhere in that expanse of infinite possibilities and experiences.
In my thinking there is simply no reason to even consider such phenomenon unless as some sort of evidence to provide credibility for the theory of every possible future already having been experienced.
I just wanted to clarify that, in my post, when I said the "future already exists" I was simply attempting to convey to the OP how a present self, and future self could coexist even on a seemingly "first timers" trip through the densities of our octave. I'm not implying that the Higher Self knows the future. Ra has stated that although the Higher Self is us in the future, it would be a infringement on our free will to know that future. It is aware of the probable paths that lead to the mid positive sixth density state of existence.
I hope I didn't give the impression that simultaneity = no free will = fate, because that is the opposite of what I was attempting to convey. Reality is determined by vantage point, and from our vantage point, this "simultaneity" is still in progression through 3rd density. From the Higher Self's perspective it has gone beyond that temporal mark.
From my perspective, the Higher Self is an amalgamation of probable selves -- us being one of those probable selves. So, from its vantage point, no road to its state of existence is more real than another road. It traveled *ALL* roads. That's why I say it is an amalgamation. This is why it doesn't know our specific future, because it is more than the some of the parts. It can't remember back and say, "I made such and such specific choice to arrive here", because it is the sum of ALL choices made by all its probable 3rd density selves (and its higher density selves).
It does know the paths through our density intimately though.
