Did the first Higher-Self have a Higher-Self before it was a Higher-Self?

[kdsii]

Ra: I am Ra. You are existing at all levels simultaneously. It is specifically correct that your higher self is you in mid-sixth-density and, in your way of measuring what you know of as time, your higher self is your self in your future." <--- BOOM!
And I'm keen on saying, I win

I joke, i joke.

All of these quotes being used here are, in my opinion being misread and contorted, unless your interpretations can be supported more concisely from other quotations. I would be keen on seeing something else to suggest that how you are interpreting this 'higher self' which Ra speaks of here as a future self is precisely what you are claiming it to be.

What I interpret from Ra's message is that the higher self being spoken of is the One Consciousness, the All. It is not any one particular identity or fragmented evolving field of consciousness. If you read these quotes and think of higher self as simply meaning the evolved consciousness of One evolving All, than there is no need to debate the dynamics of infinity and simultaneity.

As I stated earlier, what I understand is that the Higher Self is the state of the One Consciousness to the point that it has evolved at this time. or to put it more clearly, the evolved state of the One Consciousness which continues to evolve into Mystery.

I cannot really state my understanding more clearly than I have already done in my post above, but to disregard what I have pointed out by using quotes from Ra that can still be argued as possibly being misinterpretations, does not deny the credibility of my views and thoughts on the matter. It is no different than the protestant using King James version of the Bible and their interpretation to debate the Catholic Bible.

Would you consider this point and seek quotes that might elaborate on this higher self that would further support your interpretation?