David Wilcock on 2012 from Homecoming 2010

[Monica]

EDIT: I just checked, David was not there, but this passage was in Carla's presentation notes/package that was given out at Homecoming 2010, so his contribution was purely in writing...

Ah, that explains it...thanks! That's interesting that his info was given out. I know Carla's views about this differ from his.

I wonder if this will have to do with technologies regarding health and such for the generations moving forward?

I just re-read this whole thing, more carefully this time, and found myself agreeing with David on most of it. The main difference is the mechanism by which we 'ascend' which included a lot of speculation and personal dreams/astral experiences of David's.

I'm a fan of Nassim Haramein's and I believe in multiple alternate timelines. (I asked Carla about this and she had a different view about consensual reality.) Based on my own personal experiences, in which I felt that I actually 'winked in and out' of different timelines (or maybe I just watched too much Star Trek! ) and based on the scientific evidence about electrons winking in and out, and learning of Nassim's work and M Theory, I have concluded that the real significance of 2012 is that we're at a nexus, a crossroads, in which different timelines converge, and it will be our consciousness that determines where we end up.

With that single distinction, I think David's analysis is right on.

But we shall see, eh? Meanwhile, I'm still planning my spring garden...If David is right, then I'll still have that garden, but it will be in 4D Earth.

The part about transmuting the body...all that makes perfect sense to me and I was into that stuff several years before I read the Law of One...ever since I read Survival into the 21st Century, actually. I think our present bodies can indeed be transmuted from carbon-based to photon-based. So many things point to it.

---

I dunno why so many people keep quoting the 100-700 years timeframe when Q'uo(RaLatwiiHaton) amended this figure down to 100-150 years. Do people think Carla was smoking meth and imagining all the channelings besides 1980-1982? I read Q'uo's words with equal respect to Ra's channelings (and still with both discernment/intuition), because Q'uo IS Ra.

I do factor in the Q'uo material. One of my favorite sessions is this one:

http://bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=68

...which resonates as being very accurate and explains a great deal.

I don't feel that way about all the Q'uo channelings though. I certainly do respect them, and respect the great care Carla puts into her channeling. But, I don't put them on the same level as the Ra material, because that was channeled in an entirely different way, with less distortion.

Keep in mind also, that not all the channeled material available at LLResearch was channeled by Carla.

I consider all that material to still be way more pure than most other channeled works out there, but I personally don't consider them as UNdistorted and 'pure' as the Ra material.