Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material The Original Thought

    Thread: The Original Thought


    Shin'Ar

    Guest
     
    #19
    07-20-2012, 07:43 PM
    (07-20-2012, 08:37 AM)Ankh Wrote: I see rather unity, or oneness as "God" or the Creator, instead of Love. If we take what you said yourself for instance, which I loved: "...love [which Ra is saying] is the activity of unity in its free will." In this sentence 'unity' is the Creator, or God. And Love is the activity when free will finds its focus.

    I agree with this. as I tried to point out, in my thinking love is a verb not a noun.

    Love is not what is manifest from the act of expressing love. Many things are manifest from the act of expressing love. If I throw a ball and hit a person in the head with it, would we call the lump on their noggin a throw? There are many instances in certain languages where the noun is often associated with the verb. For instance if I spit on you, we would also call the saliva spit. In this way I think the word love is wrongly applied as the consequence of the action. We would say that love is the result of feeding a starving child. But in actuality, the edification of the child is the consequence of the act of love offered toward the child.

    Love is the offering of one's compassion, concern, affection, teaching, assistance, sacrifice, life and so on and so on. It is an act from one being toward another.

    It is said that one can love their self, but that would not be a true definition of love. That would simply be gratification.

    Love is an act toward another by which they are loved in the process. And when it is reciprocal it is elevated to degrees of holiness.

    How could the only Being existing at the instance of creation, express love? And how could it be love if it was merely gratifying itself?

    Where the Source of All that exists was in the process of Being, and developing First Thought, it is plausible that such thought might be "WTF, or What is This?, or even Hello????

    I have seen other websites that suggest that love is the Original Thought, and maybe such thinking was brought here from there. Maybe Ra has quotes that make such a suggestion as well.

    But in my field of understanding and comprehension, which I will be the first to admit could easily be wrong, where a Being is suddenly aware that it exists, where nothing else exists yet, why would love be its First Thought? Love toward what? Love of what? What would it love? Even if we were to suggest that love as a noun, is the result of that First Thought, it would still not be the First Thought.

    This Source was immediately confused by its State of Being, and immediately upon that act of Being, the Process of Thought was set in motion. But what was originally set in motion was an attempt to comprehend its existence. To realize its power and ability. In all comparison it was quite literally an infant being born into complete ignorance. There were no memories or instincts or even other fields to share with.

    There was One alone, beginning the first steps into what would become the All.

    What was to follow was the Process of Being. All aspects of that Process of Being, including love, including thought, including vibration, are actions, motion, consequence; creation manifest.

    The Original Thought is Being.

    You will not find this in any book or text. It is my speculation alone found within the depths of my field of consciousness. Whether memory or thought I cannot say. It is the result of my Process of Being.










    [+] The following 1 member thanked thanked for this post:1 member thanked for this post
      • Plenum
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    The Original Thought - by Shemaya - 07-17-2012, 10:06 PM
    RE: The Original Thought - by Spaced - 07-17-2012, 10:32 PM
    RE: The Original Thought - by jivatman - 07-17-2012, 10:36 PM
    RE: The Original Thought - by Siren - 07-18-2012, 10:48 AM
    RE: The Original Thought - by kdsii - 07-18-2012, 11:39 AM
    RE: The Original Thought - by Shin'Ar - 07-18-2012, 05:52 PM
    RE: The Original Thought - by Siren - 07-18-2012, 07:02 PM
    RE: The Original Thought - by Ankh - 07-18-2012, 04:01 PM
    RE: The Original Thought - by AnthroHeart - 07-18-2012, 04:41 PM
    RE: The Original Thought - by Shemaya - 07-18-2012, 05:47 PM
    RE: The Original Thought - by Ankh - 07-19-2012, 06:51 PM
    RE: The Original Thought - by Siren - 07-18-2012, 06:00 PM
    RE: The Original Thought - by Plenum - 07-18-2012, 07:59 PM
    RE: The Original Thought - by Siren - 07-19-2012, 12:23 PM
    RE: The Original Thought - by Shemaya - 07-19-2012, 08:18 PM
    RE: The Original Thought - by Ankh - 07-20-2012, 08:37 AM
    RE: The Original Thought - by Shin'Ar - 07-20-2012, 07:43 PM
    RE: The Original Thought - by Siren - 07-21-2012, 01:36 AM
    RE: The Original Thought - by Siren - 07-20-2012, 10:03 AM
    RE: The Original Thought - by Ankh - 07-20-2012, 02:44 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode