07-24-2012, 08:37 AM
(07-23-2012, 09:32 PM)plenum Wrote: there is a mind/body/spirit complex which is a thing in itself, and overlaps with the 3d chemical body
The yellow-ray body is but one of the bodies of the mind/body/spirit complex.
Quote:I guess I tend to think of time/space as being 'out there' somewhere; whereas Ra makes the simple distinction of space/time being the seen world, and time/space being the unseen world.
Yes, but is time/space (the metaphysical) truly invisible or simply unseen to 3D (especially "veiled")? Unseen is Love, intelligengt energy, vibration, consciousness. Yet it clothes itself in light; or rather is manifested through light. And as such, it can be seen.
(PS: Time/space is the "in here" and space/time is the "out there.")
Why would the energy nexi (chakras) be colord-coded if they were "invisible"?
Having had several "astral projections" (both consciouslly willed and "accidental") I can tell you time/space is very much visible. Maybe not so normally from 3rd density's space/time (and again, take the "veil" into account here).
On that note, I have never seen this ellusive "silver cord" attached to my body in any way, neither at the navel, heart or forehead; and yet, I was vividly, lucidly awake when I saw/see my body "sleeping" in my bed. No cords. And still I know I am still "connected" to the body.
Quote:The english word space contains a hint of nothingness that is not really reflective of the nature of the concept.
Yet it is! For only Nothingness can contain infinite possibilities/potential; just as one can create music out of silence or one may draws a painting out of an empty canvas. This is the true meaning of the Void: that it is PLENUM. One simply chooses what notes to play, what shapes and forms to focus upon. This was Khaos to the Greeks (before it became the "chaos" of the westerners).
Quote:obviously these extra bodies allow us to interact with higher subdensities of 3d, giving us the opportunity of accessing extra information, qualities, abilities
I didn't quite understand this statement. Perhaps you could clarify?