08-19-2012, 08:25 PM
(08-19-2012, 06:05 PM)zenmaster Wrote: Rate of vibration is frequency. The subdensities correspond to a vibratory rate. As an entity evolves, it becomes less and less distorted and vibrates at a higher core vibration - this core vibration can be seen in violet ray. As an entity evolves, it also becomes less and less distorted.
Cicumstances can lower the expression of a vibration to the extent one is caught up in some distortion. But when what is causing that circumstantial distortion is eventually accepted, the distortion is removed. The whole process of raising one's vibration before some working is putting oneself in a centered state where the grosser distortions are simply not at one's immediate attention.
I won't go as far as to suggest that how anyone chooses to interpret distortion is wrong or right, but I would say that there should be a particular way that it is used in the Ra material which should not be used in a different way if one wants to get the actual meaning behind the message accurate.
It is my understanding, and that is certainly not substantial given my minimal study of the Ra Material to date, that when Ra uses the term distortion it refers to simple vibration, regardless of frequency or all of this scientific jargon that is spoke of here.
I interpret distortion to be vibration period.
There is stillness without distortion.
And where there is vibration there is a distortion of that stillness.
If you replace stillness with void, and distortion with thought, you have the means of creation.
Distortion as I understand it, is simply the distortion of stillness, like the ripples on the glassy surface of a lake.
distortion = disturbance
I must agree with Zen here that rate of vibration is its frequency. This is why they call it frequency. It is by measuring the frequency of particular pitches and valleys in the wave that particular frequencies are matched and designated.
I also agree with Zen that as a field evolves that frequency will also become of a higher pitch and increased rate.
What I do not quite understand is Zen's use of 'less distortion'. But then I often have trouble understanding Zen and am really not quite sure why that is and usually have to just let it go for the sake of cordiality.
I love Zen and have no desire to offend him or seek argument, and this regular inability of mine to understand his terminologies would only serve to end in offense. He has a few rough edges that come out in his efforts to make his point and I like to handle my bass with kid gloves. LOL Zen.
So to make my point and end it there with no further need to continue, in my thinking once stillness has been distorted, any distortion, regardless of its frequency, is distortion. There is no decreasing or increasing of it as any rate is still distortion of stillness.
So I can only assume that what Zen is speaking of is the various rates of frequency increasing or decreasing, and that I would be in harmonic frequency with.
.