07-12-2015, 04:24 PM
(07-12-2015, 01:07 PM)Elros Tar-Minyatur Wrote:(07-12-2015, 12:58 PM)metieta Wrote: I do not understand here is why Monica keeps labeling STS when Ra said it's not ethics that polarizes someone negative. A person hunting and eating animals doesn't necessarily intentionally energize certain ray centers (orange/yellow/blue) and inhibit others (green)? If your service is in protecting animals is your thing that's great. Yet this labeling of others as StS/STO is inane. When you don't like something others' do you say they are STS?
It's like saying for every person who seems over the top you label them histrionic or whatnot. That's probably why people react. Seems like negative interpretation of catalyst. Which is de-polarizing or polarizing neg.
She considers the slaugthering of animals as infridgment of their free will, hence the STS. At least that's how I perceived it.
IMO, everyone is being true to themselves which is perfectly fine.
Still confused around free will of animal-STS connection. How are we to know an animal's free will, if they are capable of making such choices? In 3D we have a challenging time understanding free-will (not all the time, of course) due to our veil. It would be more of a big deal if a higher density being like Ra SMC were to violate our free will bc they are able to understand situation w/ more 'clarity' due to their scope of understanding. We're 3D, we don't know 2D free will, only project our will onto them. I don't agree with the methods used to slaughter them for sure... But I can't see how free will and animals are in operation as per confederation philosophy?
It sounds more like Monica's projection of her free will onto animals than knowing 2D free will?