Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Science & Technology The Tunguska event

    Thread: The Tunguska event


    Lavazza (Offline)

    Humble Citizen of Eternity
    Posts: 1,029
    Threads: 109
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #31
    01-21-2012, 01:47 AM (This post was last modified: 01-21-2012, 01:50 AM by Lavazza.)
    Well, we have to be fair- the purpose of the probe was to monitor human activities, and it was very likely in close proximity to many humans when it became dangerous. That they were able to detonate something that is 1000 times as powerful as Hiroshima with zero human casualties can hardly be called work of the inept! If humans pulled that off it would be nothing short of a miracle.

    The take away from this discussion for me is that mistakes happen... and will continue to happen in the future. And nobody is perfect. I like how DuncanIdaho called that part a comfort. I agree. Heart

    [+] The following 3 members thanked thanked Lavazza for this post:3 members thanked Lavazza for this post
      • Conifer16, βαθμιαίος, Parsons
    zenmaster (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 5,541
    Threads: 132
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #32
    01-21-2012, 02:55 AM
    (01-21-2012, 01:47 AM)Eric Wrote: The take away from this discussion for me is that mistakes happen...
    WTF was so important in 1908 to monitor.


      •
    BrownEye Away

    Positive Deviant
    Posts: 3,446
    Threads: 297
    Joined: Jun 2009
    #33
    01-21-2012, 03:06 AM
    I'm trippin out on the arguments in some of these threads LoL. I think it's the solar flares ha ha.
    [+] The following 2 members thanked thanked BrownEye for this post:2 members thanked BrownEye for this post
      • Diana, Parsons
    Conifer16 (Offline)

    You're brilliant! :-)
    Posts: 745
    Threads: 56
    Joined: Feb 2011
    #34
    01-21-2012, 04:42 AM (This post was last modified: 01-21-2012, 04:43 AM by Conifer16.)
    @zen

    Tesla maybe?
    The wright brothers? First aircraft in thousands of years is pretty important. IMO

      •
    βαθμιαίος (Offline)

    Doughty Seeker
    Posts: 1,758
    Threads: 33
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #35
    01-21-2012, 07:36 AM
    Tesla and lots of others. "You were, at that time, beginning work in a more technical sphere. We were interested in determining the extent and the rapidity of your advances."

      •
    AnthroHeart (Offline)

    Anthro at Heart
    Posts: 19,119
    Threads: 1,298
    Joined: Jan 2010
    #36
    01-21-2012, 10:08 AM
    I think the failure of only one drone out of how many they probably used is a pretty good track record.

      •
    zenmaster (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 5,541
    Threads: 132
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #37
    01-21-2012, 03:06 PM
    (01-19-2012, 11:55 PM)Eric Wrote: Perhaps if they were wiser (no insult to the Confederation implied) the scenario of a malfunctioning nuclear drone wouldn't have come up at all because they would have some more sophisticated means.
    The seeming lack of sophistication of their monitoring is the odd bit about that. Seems strangely conventional - overly conventional.

      •
    βαθμιαίος (Offline)

    Doughty Seeker
    Posts: 1,758
    Threads: 33
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #38
    01-21-2012, 04:12 PM
    Similar to their use of communication equipment, I guess. (Session 60)

      •
    Oceania Away

    Account Closed
    Posts: 4,006
    Threads: 56
    Joined: May 2011
    #39
    01-21-2012, 05:12 PM
    i thought they could read our minds.

      •
    Parsons (Offline)

    Citizen of Eternity
    Posts: 2,857
    Threads: 84
    Joined: Nov 2011
    #40
    01-21-2012, 07:35 PM (This post was last modified: 01-21-2012, 07:36 PM by Parsons.)
    I'm assuming they communicate with ANYONE via willing parties only. These people contacting would be advanced channelers (actually, they would be remote viewers from their end, I guess). But I'm sure not every single one of them in their society might be skilled in that. So they wouldn't be able to play it back to a group of people trying to discuss it, say. Also, the human or animal instrument might not have the capacity to sense / measure accurately whatever they were interested in learning about(such as new energies being emitted in some experiment done by Tesla or other scientist).

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

    Pages (2): « Previous 1 2



    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode