Ra Material replies that do not begin with "I am Ra"

[meng leren]

One obvious characteristic of the Ra dialogues is that Ra almost always begin their reply with the phrase "I am Ra."

I believe there are some replies in the Ra Material which do not begin with this phrase.  I was starting to thumb through the books to search for them, but it occurred to me that some clever soul must have already made such an analysis.

Is anyone aware of such a study-- of Ra's replies in which they neglect to state their identity?  Has anyone observed a pattern to those replies?  




ps Goodbye Carla-- Thank you for your HARD service!  It must be a relief to be home at last...

[Jeremy]

These were potentially replies from them that weren't as in tuned with Ra's intention thus they were considered transient questions.

Good perception!

[Bluebell]

they're totally demon replies!

[βαθμιαίος]

Here is a (probably partial) list:
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
1.12
3.4
3.5
3.7
3.15
3.16
3.17
3.18
4.3
4.4
4.14
4.16
6.3
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.8
6.9
6.10
6.11
6.12
6.15
6.19
6.24
6.27
6.28
6.29
7.4
7.6
7.7
8.4
8.8
8.13
8.24
8.34
9.10
9.14
10.2
10.3
10.17
10.18
11.10
11.18
13.4
13.7
13.8
13.17
14.2
14.20
14.22
15.25
16.18
16.29
16.34
17.5
18.21
20.9
20.14
20.19
21.16
21.19
22.19
22.27
23.18
24.12
24.22
26.8
26.16
26.18
30.18
36.20
40.17
43.4
43.13
46.9
51.1
54.27
56.6
62.4
62.29
62.30
65.14
97.14
102.2
103.2
104.19
106.16

[andreazzi]

Wow! Nice job!

In your opinion, is there any reason for this lack of acknowledgement?

[APeacefulWarrior]

I may have found a clue in Session 6. He explicitly states in 6.12 he was having trouble keeping contact with the channel. This might support the idea that it represents how "in tune" that answer was with him.

[Minyatur]

Channeling is like turning one body into an antena. There is no guideline as to what answers other than the intention of the channeler as to what he wishes to receive as information.

[meng leren]

Thank you βαθμιαίος for the distillation of non-Ra responses.  I can't say that I've gone through all of them yet, but a cursory review gives me the impression that perhaps there were other entities on the line with Ra, contributing when needed.  Maybe when the line of questioning moved technically to certain areas of expertise, other entities helped to generate the response.  It seems like a number of the early non-Ra replies were about Carla's energetics as the channel.  Maybe Ra was getting help from others to advise on these points?  

As for the suggestion that the non-Ra replies were "demonic", I see no evidence of that possibility in the nature of the replies given.

[Reaper]

I know Carla and Jim themselves attributed it to points where their tuning was going out of focus, usually because Don was focusing too much on details that were regarded as transient, essentially lowering the vibration of the channeling. Toward the end of the contact the flawless dynamic between the three of them became somewhat disrupted as well, which made holding that perfect balance more difficult.