04-26-2011, 04:55 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-26-2011, 05:09 AM by Ens Entium.)
(04-26-2011, 03:58 AM)Azrael Wrote: Yes, that can serve to be a catalyst for learning for the children.
Since we choose whom we incarnate to and are informed of particular life implications prior to incarnation, it would most likely be part of the dance.
So lets say i decided, right now, spur of the moment, to, indiscriminately, kill 50 people. Don't you think that represents an unforeseen loss for the children- considered preincarnatively even? And since it seems you imply provision of catalyst is sto, i must then be doing a really good job at being of sto since i'm providing great catalyst in terms of then forcing the children left behind to learn to accept their lot and deal with the loss of the parent who could be a bread winner.
Important to remember is the word service. This means we act in support of the survival, values and intentions held. With the provision, for service to others that your actions not detract from the primary objective of helping others.. i.e. serving the values and intentions of an sts individual is not sto, or at least mixed polarity.
In response to the original question. I think we accept those agents which can act as cause by virtue of their being, to do otherwise would invalidate them as such, and so fragment the principle of free will. We do not.. need to accept the effects that issue from them. Carried to it's fullest extent this acceptance renders our intentions moot. This is the principle i see here. So i would stop the murder. Just my thoughts, they're not new on this thread, just repackaged, which is hopefully of some help.