05-10-2011, 11:12 PM
(05-10-2011, 11:02 PM)kycahi Wrote: Blockage from loving self is very prevalent around this place, IMHO. That doesn't mean that removing said blockage leads to STS. I think it's part of that balancing that Ra is so keen on.
I was painting the picture that keeping the blockages was STS and releasing is STO.
from my impending "should" thread:
Quote:42.4 Questioner: In the illusion that we now experience it is difficult to maintain this response[love] especially if the attack results in physical pain, but I assume that this response should be maintained even through physical pain or loss of life. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct and further is of a major or principle importance in understanding, shall we say, the principle of balance. Balance is not indifference but rather the observer not blinded by any feelings of separation but rather fully imbued with love.
(05-10-2011, 11:02 PM)kycahi Wrote: Yet those new parents also start behaving less recklessly, therefore "loving selves," because that love of the tiny other-self makes them want to protect from their not being around. All of this is natural, non-conscious opening up to love of other, i.e. the new being.
So your assignment for this evening is to go out and find another self and start making that new baby.
#4 is on her way
One thing babies then teach us: that we are all born STS inclined. Oh yeah, without a doubt.