09-30-2011, 09:39 AM
Understood.
Here is the thing for me. This "perceived purpose" is none other than a twisted definition for power. In that pursuit, one will eventually find themselves on the other side of the table, and in hindsight, will completely contradict the "purpose". I conclude this because I see the ideal of purified communication as fallacy. The fallacy I perceive is directly related to always finding oneself on the other side of the table, so to speak. It is an inescapable, never ending loop.
We ourselves can't and won't allow the "perceived purpose" to be a definitive agreement. The 'perfect' mind we share IS the authenticity of projections and emotions and garbled wholeness.
Again, I've said as much, your efforts go toward this "perceived purpose", and I am not against that. I do not intend to speak "past you", but I am stating my opinions, and my opinions are deeply rooted in perceiving past this illusional "perceived purpose." In other words, all is in vain if there is no entity continuation. Since we will never figure that one out, there is no apparent reason to "develop."
I see no difference between this man, this man, this man, this man, or this man.
(09-30-2011, 09:11 AM)zenmaster Wrote: If a person discovers a more desirable state, that often is the result of finding that much more wholeness or authenticity or sufficiency (not luck). This discovery often shared for the perceived purpose of benefiting society. We ourselves can and must do this, not some ET group who has 'been there done that', because we share the same 'experiential nexus' or 'mind' - the (evolving) planetary logos. It's not like we have to pull ourselves up by our own bootstraps, as we are innately whole, have a self-imposed limitations, and require merely honesty to resolve basically all conflict and difficulty.
Here is the thing for me. This "perceived purpose" is none other than a twisted definition for power. In that pursuit, one will eventually find themselves on the other side of the table, and in hindsight, will completely contradict the "purpose". I conclude this because I see the ideal of purified communication as fallacy. The fallacy I perceive is directly related to always finding oneself on the other side of the table, so to speak. It is an inescapable, never ending loop.
We ourselves can't and won't allow the "perceived purpose" to be a definitive agreement. The 'perfect' mind we share IS the authenticity of projections and emotions and garbled wholeness.
Again, I've said as much, your efforts go toward this "perceived purpose", and I am not against that. I do not intend to speak "past you", but I am stating my opinions, and my opinions are deeply rooted in perceiving past this illusional "perceived purpose." In other words, all is in vain if there is no entity continuation. Since we will never figure that one out, there is no apparent reason to "develop."
I see no difference between this man, this man, this man, this man, or this man.