10-04-2011, 08:48 PM
(10-04-2011, 07:35 AM)3DMonkey Wrote: Foolhearty, in light of infinity, yes. Continue to learn and to develop, in light of a singular incarnation, yes. I do not deny any opportunity. I welcome each individuals expression and expressed needs. They are each equal to me. That is what I'm saying.No, that's your projection (again) merely framing it as backhanded. The idea of accept was merely what can be accepted as a premise. From my perspective, each premise is (mis)directed towards the idea of infinity, from which there can be no comparison. Of course we all know that, so I wonder why it continues to be done?
Are you aware that this sentence, "Just want to know what you can accept", is a backhanded inquiry to limit my Self with any answer I give? (like Did you stop beating your wife today?)
(10-04-2011, 07:35 AM)3DMonkey Wrote: I'm sure you will then point out it is my projections, etc., and then we go another round on the "circle", you and I. " I'd say so, because an assumption had to be made based on a faulty premise which was probably ego satisfying rather than truth seeking. Did you know better? Deep down probably so."Indeed. If each premise is to referred back to that nothingness or infinity or "ground of being" then there is no framework for which to compare and no discussion possible. Such is the circle.