05-28-2012, 10:05 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-28-2012, 10:06 AM by Tenet Nosce.)
(05-27-2012, 09:34 PM)yossarian Wrote: Your mistake is thinking that I'm objecting. I'm asking some questions. I don't mean to be contrarian or antagonistic but I do mean to ask some Pointed Questions.
Got it.
Quote:What is the logic? I don't see how trusting that All is Well is logical, I guess it depends a great deal on your premises.
All logical conclusions are built up from premises. In this case, the premise is that "All is One".
Quote:I literally want to know how you guys reconcile it all. On one hand you talk about the importance of trusting scientific elites and then on the other hand you are here... on the Law of One forum... there seems to be an inconsistency.
I would recommend you begin by identifying where your own projections are in the conversation. Where did I say it was "important to trust scientific elites"?
Quote:But intuitive scientists have no respect for evidence. They just believe s*** that resonates, cherry pick some evidence, and call it "proved" -- see David Wilcock, Free Energy people, that Proctor & Gamble guy from Thrive, yossarian, etc. These are people who consider themselves intuitive scientists but really they are just pseudoscientists.
Oh no, LOL. Those people aren't scientists! I mean real live scientists (that conduct scientific experiments and publish them in journals) who use their intuition to identify premises.
Quote:So do you think the Ra material supports logical thinking?
Yes.
Quote:If so, why does it suggest you only trust things that are resonant?
It doesn't.