10-09-2013, 06:40 PM
So today I was reading session 7, going over the part where Don asks about which densities make up Orion. Ra says:
RA: I am Ra. Like the Confederation, the densities of the mass-consciousness which comprise that group are varied. There are a very few third density, a larger number of fourth density, a similarly large number of fifth density, and very few sixth density entities comprising this organization.
Then, later, in session 62, there is this:
QUESTIONER: Is this the fourth-density group we are talking about?
RA: I am Ra. There are fourth and a few fifth-density members of the Orion group.
QUESTIONER: Then the top of the pecking order is fifth-density?
RA: I am Ra. This is correct.
I might be missing something here, but these two statements seem entirely contradictory. It makes me wonder if Ra meant to say sixth-density in place of fifth in session 62, which could make a difference in how the densities are perceived, especially in regard to the negative polarity. I suppose there could also be some level of context I am just missing.
Does anyone have any thoughts on what was going on here? Insights?
I will also say this due to several responses I've already gotten to this question: I'm not attempting to attack the Ra Material here, and even if it is a blatant mistake, that wouldn't make me throw out my entire belief system. I'm not attempting to nitpick or disprove. I would just like clarity if anyone could offer it.
RA: I am Ra. Like the Confederation, the densities of the mass-consciousness which comprise that group are varied. There are a very few third density, a larger number of fourth density, a similarly large number of fifth density, and very few sixth density entities comprising this organization.
Then, later, in session 62, there is this:
QUESTIONER: Is this the fourth-density group we are talking about?
RA: I am Ra. There are fourth and a few fifth-density members of the Orion group.
QUESTIONER: Then the top of the pecking order is fifth-density?
RA: I am Ra. This is correct.
I might be missing something here, but these two statements seem entirely contradictory. It makes me wonder if Ra meant to say sixth-density in place of fifth in session 62, which could make a difference in how the densities are perceived, especially in regard to the negative polarity. I suppose there could also be some level of context I am just missing.
Does anyone have any thoughts on what was going on here? Insights?
I will also say this due to several responses I've already gotten to this question: I'm not attempting to attack the Ra Material here, and even if it is a blatant mistake, that wouldn't make me throw out my entire belief system. I'm not attempting to nitpick or disprove. I would just like clarity if anyone could offer it.