11-07-2015, 10:23 AM
(11-06-2015, 10:20 PM)Elros Tar-Minyatur Wrote: Yeah the Creator did not wish to experience suffering or know itself, you are definitely right.
This is such a common 'New Age' misinterpretation. Shirley MacClaine caused quite a stir in the Christian communities when she proclaimed in a film "I AM GOD" which of course sounded like she was saying she was ALL of God, The One UNdifferentiated, UNdistorted Creator, which of course she wasn't.
All of us are God, in a holographic sense. But NONE of us are The UNdistorted Creator.
Ra explains this concept very well, in terms of distortion. You are completely leaving out distortion.
So yeah, sure, the Creator wants women to be raped and children to be slaughtered and children to be raped and ongoing wars and all the other myriad atrocities going on in this messed-up world. Apparently the Creator either wants all that or... :idea: doesn't care because the UNdistorted Creator is beyond all that. Who knows? Not even Ra knows, so we're deluding ourselves if we think we can speak for the UNdistorted One Infinite Creator.
So it's a moot point.
What we DO know is that, regardless of what their Higher Self programmed as part of their life curriculum, NO human and NO animal chooses to be tortured or killed. End of story.
If their conscious free-will choice wasn't important, then why did Ra go to such great lengths to explain the concepts of free will and what it means to impose on the free will of other sentient beings? Even going so far as to call this density the Density of Choice.
Choice matters here, at this nexus. What the UNdistorted Creator may or may not want is completely unknown, and therefore completely irrelevant.
(11-06-2015, 10:20 PM)Elros Tar-Minyatur Wrote: I do not think of entities in the same manner that you think of them. If your question is.. Does the 2D entity wishes for it while it is happening? surely not... Does the higher self of that entity which exist in a simultaneousl parallel manner to it's lower self wish for it? Yes, it does.
This has been addressed ad nauseam. If the woman walking down a dark alley has been programmed by her Higher Self to experience the catalyst of being raped, is that a justification for YOU or I to be the one to do the dirty deed?
How many times have I asked that same question? At least a dozen times in recent threads. To use the point that the woman's Higher Self or the animal's Higher Self has chosen that catalyst as a justification for harming them and imposing on their conscious free will, is to demonstrate that one either a.) doesn't understand the basic concepts of STS and STO...OR b.) does understand but doesn't care...in which case the implications are clear.
...