(05-11-2010, 09:34 AM)Eddie Wrote: [ -> ]I'd be curious to hear the reactions of people to this interview, from Project Camelot:
Peter Sterling, 2012, the coming changes
Unfortunately, I'm very biased on this topic, but I have to say that even so I did not resonate much with Peter's message. Despite him saying that the Greys told him the shift was not to be feared, it certainly sounded very fearful to me. It was like fear/panic triggers (literally "abort the planet!" and "There is no way to stop it!"), mixed in with platitudes. It described mass extinction for the majority of people and fed into those "aliens as saviors" theories floating around out there.
Another thing that struck me is the guy came off as seemingly loving and spiritual, but there was a certain "cardboard" quality to him. It's hard to put my finger on exactly what it is, but his spirituality just didn't feel very authentic. Oddly enough, I had the same reaction to Drunvalo M's interviews, where something didn't quite feel right...it sounded right but wasn't. So I was really surprised when he referenced being a Drunvalo student!
And what's up with leaving an alien implant mark on the guy's neck as a way to verify that the experience was real?!
But then again, maybe it's just my aversion to the Greys that is making me too biased to see the interview clearly.
I'll just leave this on a quote from Ra that I think is particularly relevant:
Ra Wrote:53.17 Questioner: Then in general we could say that if an individual has a ‘Close Encounter’ with a UFO or any other type experience that seems to be UFO-related, he must look to the heart of the encounter and the effect upon him to determine whether it was Orion or Confederation contact. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. If there is fear and doom, the contact was quite likely of a negative nature. If the result is hope, friendly feelings, and the awakening of a positive feeling of purposeful service-to-others, the marks of Confederation contact are evident.
Love to all
Yeah, I pretty much took the same interpretation as did Pablisimo. He seems like a nice man, and I believe that he believes what he is saying. But the core message he has given is a dead ringer for much of the doom and gloom STS message that is mentioned in the above Ra quote. With regard to the idea of abandoning or evacuating the planet, I was reminded of the old saying... "If you're not happy where you are, you won't be happy anywhere". The saying is old but so very true. I don't say this in any way to degrade Peter's character, but it is crucial as he said at the end of his interview that discernment and resonance is key.
Just for fun, contrast the general "feel" of Peter's interview with this one, which I saw this morning with Jeff Gitterman:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKFcYtEYa0A
Or how about this one with Sonia Choquette
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EA2sc8WWuoI
Feels much different, no?
P.S. he does play the harp beautifully, it was worth watching for that alone.