Bring4th

Full Version: The Law of One Wikipedia article has been deleted for the infinite time, not by me
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
I was on vacation the week it happened. I was not involved. A member of this community attempted to disrupt the deletion discussions several times, only further antagonizing the entire bureaucracy to dismantle The Law of One article.

They were able to dismantle it with one key reason in mind: New Age sources that are slanted to blind faith in spiritual metaphysics and philosophy aren't acceptable when Wikipedia is full of equally dogmatic atheists.

In other words, you can't build a Wikipedia on writings that remain within belief systems that cannot be accepted by the average soccer mom. It isn't MySpace or Facebook. It's an "attempt" at an objective encyclopedia. Truthfully, the article should have had no more than one paragraph of neutral, objective, summarical material. Lip service to higher ideals of spiritual indoctrination had other ideals.

The only way to get the article accepted on such a slanted site is to use "authoritative" sources such as The New York Times, The Huffington Post, ABC, etc.

You can't interact with the common man and other uncommon men while remaining within a New Age bubble.
For posterity, I have made the link of all arguments for and against the article separate to indicate neutrality:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:...aterial%29
Hi, "Ra material" fans.

Could this be a link that could be used for our resurrection in WikiP ?
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2015/08/26
"They" DO talk/write about Carla.
AND CtoC is the most important radio station, because
Coast to Coast AM airs on more than 600 stations in the U.S.,
as well as Canada. . .
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/pages/about

A so important show IS certainly a very good recommendation !?

I am glad that WP keeps stuff about "Edgar Cayce", but
WHY can't they keep stuff about Carla is a mystery to me;
or the decision of a materialist WP controler. . .

If they keep Cayce, they must also keep Carla !
Carla had a "way" of communication similar to Edgar. . .

Blue skies.
(12-01-2015, 04:11 PM)C-JEAN Wrote: [ -> ]Hi, "Ra material" fans.

Could this be a link that could be used for our resurrection in WikiP ?
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2015/08/26
"They" DO talk/write about Carla.
AND CtoC is the most important radio station, because
Coast to Coast AM airs on more than 600 stations in the U.S.,
as well as Canada. . .
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/pages/about

A so important show IS certainly a very good recommendation !?

I am glad that WP keeps stuff about "Edgar Cayce", but
WHY can't they keep stuff about Carla is a mystery to me;
or the decision of a materialist WP controler. . .

If they keep Cayce, they must also keep Carla !
Carla had a "way" of communication similar to Edgar. . .

Blue skies.

I think you can understand what would happen if Coast-to-Coast was used a reference for every major article on Wikipedia: It wouldnt be a Wikipedia that anyone would feel comfortable participating on. With this standard in play, youre going to have a very rough ride resurrecting the article with Coast-to-Coast reference. In fact, you might be laughed at heavily.
On another topic: If anyone wishes to contest the deletion, they can try at the link below. Have fun. It's rough.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review
Personally, I can't reason why anyone would care to push against such resistance.  Let the the atheists have their reductionist religious scientism.  Clearly, they want it really bad.

"Consider, if you will, the path your life-experience complex has taken. Consider the coincidences and odd circumstances by which one thing flowed to the next. Consider this well.

Each entity will receive the opportunity that each needs. This information source-beingness does not have uses in the life-experience complex of each of those among your peoples who seek. Thus the advertisement is general and not designed to indicate the searching out of any particular material, but only to suggest the noumenal aspect of the illusion.
"

[...]

"Why then be concerned with the grass that blooms, withers and dies in its season only to grow once again due to the infinite love and light of the One Creator? This is the message we bring. Each entity is only superficially that which blooms and dies. In the deeper sense there is no end to beingness."
-----