(02-05-2016, 06:21 PM)Adonai One Wrote: [ -> ]Who are you?
Do you prefer to A) "just be", B) contemplate things, C) focus on your career, D) share emotions, E) argue politics, F) cause great change in the world, or to G) know everything?
A)
Just be seems like to live purely for the self. I think we do that all the time, whether sleeping or eating, or using the bathroom.. To be honest.
We are always be ing... right? In what way would a wanderer not be themselves? more like uncovering of the self into the heart of all things reciprocated and mirrored to the self.
B) I don't know about you guys but there is no off switch for this... contemplate things? Contemplation becomes increasingly abstract and harder to put lessons into a simple set of words. Though the way I learn things does not seem to be through contemplation at all, it's as if the memories and ideas are put there by some other person. Channeling? I just don't think we always know what we are thinking and when we are thinking we are directly accessing information from our spark. Time spent contemplating is deep and ever changing.
C) Someone once said to me that work is play, so finding a way for work to be play, is good, I find ways to be grateful for my job, and grateful for the interactions i do get to have day to day. I find doing menial things that directly affect other's lives is a good way to help others. focusing on my career is directly proportionate and tied to my levels of patience, understanding, and commitment to clarity and empathy in communication. While what most may call menial, I call doing the hard graduate courses in consciousness. Putting theory into practice.
D) Healthy Boundaries, So I don't necessarily share my emotions with everyone, to experience oneness, one must also be one with those who do not experience it.
E) With all the proof and investigations and aware consensus, there is no need to argue politics, it's easy to tell who is paid by dubious corporations and who is not. The matter is more can people be
[font=DDG_ProximaNova, DDG_ProximaNova_UI_0, DDG_ProximaNova_UI_1, DDG_ProximaNova_UI_2, DDG_ProximaNova_UI_3, DDG_ProximaNova_UI_4, DDG_ProximaNova_UI_5, DDG_ProximaNova_UI_6, 'Proxima Nova', 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, 'Segoe UI', 'Nimbus Sans L', 'Liberation Sans', 'Open Sans', FreeSans, Arial, sans-serif]cognizant[/font] enough to understand the facts behind it that would prove it. For example you take the topic of UFOS which could have been ridiculed, though now that all that stuff is on the CIA website, theres no more joke to it. So it's more like how behind the times is the individual pertaining to argue politics, or rather what proof have they not had the time space of learning to make those connections?
F) since day 1, since day 1 out of the womb I knew I had a mission. I knew.
G) All the time. I want to know everything, and need to accept that I cannot in a 3rd density body, but that doesn't stop me from still trying to learn and cram it all in anyway. =̴̶̷̤̄ .̫ =̴̶̷̤̄