Ricdaw I concur with others in finding your post particularly brilliant. I however disagree with its principal premise, that being that the past consist of shifting probabilities, perhaps shifting in proportion to our present point of view. (“Present” here used in a temporal sense, not the eternal one.)
Even if we are on a “choose your own adventure” path whereby we continually pluck one path from an ambiance of infinite probabilities; and even if there are multitudinous versions of ourselves out there in the multi-verse – parallel dimensions where Truman chose not to drop the atomic bomb, or Lincoln chose not to preserve the union – we writing in the forums at this moment are on
one particular timeline that is part of a continuum of countless, I contend,
fixed decisions and choices before us.
Atomic energy was developed. We now live in a nuclear age capable of powering cities and of destroying the planet. The personal computer was invented followed not long thereafter by the internet. We now communicate in the forums, among other new realities. Women spent much of the past few thousand years in most cultures being treated as second-class people or worse, we now experience countless ramifications as a result. These events have happened and continue to shape our present experience
within the realm of space/time.
As Tolle would remind us we needn’t be chained to the past: entrance into the present moment and forgiveness can release us from those cycles. He, along with Ra, would also remind us that those seemingly historical events happened in the only “place” they can happen: in the eternal present moment. But neither reminder denies or erases the actuality of said events in space/time.
Regarding the different testimonies that may appear about one individual, including the different versions your mom may share about you, why would that be not attributable to subjective eye-of-the-beholder perception? And the various distortions therein.
There will naturally be hundreds of millions of perceptions and vantage points on 9/11, say, but that doesn’t mean that each one describes what
actually happened. Certainly there is a validity to each person’s point of view on
any subject, even if they choose to believe the moon is made of cheese. That doesn’t mean, however, that the moon is, actually, made of cheese. (If a qualifier is needed, then: that doesn’t mean, however, that the moon is actually made of cheese
in this particular stream of space/time.)
I think it potentially unhinging and even dangerous to say that history is that flexible, fluid, subjective, and probabilistic that there are no fixed, objective events. Certainly our perceptions, understanding, and retroactive experience of history
is such, but asserting that the historical past (however illusory it, like everything else, may ultimately be against the backdrop of eternity) is probabilistic is to ratify holocaust deniers and others who would intentionally revise history to suit present, negative agendas. Or, more comically, the assertions of Christian fundamentalists that the Earth is 4,000 years old.
What would be the point, then, of “fact-checking” the statements made by a presidential campaign?
*********************************************
There are a few instances where Ra comments on the nature/experience of history:
[/url]
Quote:82.14 Questioner: Did this in fact happen on some of the planets or on a large percentage of the planets near the center of this galaxy in this way?
Ra: I am Ra. Our knowledge is limited. We know of the beginning but cannot asseverate to the precise experiences of those things occurring before us. You know the nature of historical teaching. At our level of learn/teaching we may expect little distortion. However, we cannot, with surety, say there is no distortion as we speak of specific occurrences of which we were not consciously a part. It is our understanding that your supposition is correct. Thus we so hypothesize.
Here I interpret Ra as acknowledging the difficulty of understanding what actually happened before one's present experience because of the limitations of time, the subjectivity of perception, the accumulated layers of subjective perception over long spans of time, and whatever other hosts of distortions may enter the picture.
However, Ra indicates that it is possible to understand historical events with a reduction in distortion, at least at their level of experience.
But, they do indicate that their purpose with the group is not to be a teacher of history:
Quote:2.2 Ra: The teach/learning which is our responsibility is philosophical rather than historical.
In the following Q&A they say something that at first glance seems more in accord with your position, but I don’t take it to substantiate the point of view that history is probabilistic. Why? Because, from the standpoint of the Big Picture, one can place the word “no” in front of everything that seems real to us. There is “no” right/wrong, past/future, STO STS, space/time, imperfection, incompleteness, lack of wholeness, or separation.
Indeed there is no anything save for infinity, whatever that is.
Quote:[url=http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?s=16]16.21 Questioner: Can you give me some kind of history of your social memory complex and how you became aware of the Law of One?
Ra: I am Ra. The path of our learning is graven in the present moment. There is no history, as we understand your concept. Picture, if you will, a circle of being. We know the alpha and omega as infinite intelligence. The circle never ceases. It is present. The densities we have traversed at various points in the circle correspond to the characteristics of cycles: first, the cycle of awareness; second, the cycle of growth; third, the cycle of self-awareness; fourth, the cycle of love or understanding; fifth, the cycle of light or wisdom; sixth, the cycle of light/love, love/light, or unity; seventh, the gateway cycle; eighth, the octave which moves into a mystery we do not plumb.
But, within the constructs of the creation, whatever its depth of illusion, I contend that there
is a fixed history in our past space/time.
Now if I could just complete work on my functioning time machine . . .