Bring4th

Pages: 1 2

This is a daily space weather report on solar activity and other space pertinent information. It also covers related science topics including Earth changes and new discoveries/theories for the cosmos in general. Occasionally there are political topics and comments regarding science and technology such as GMO's, climate change, etc.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsmEOvxuZMA

For those who don't know -

Our little sun has entered middle age and we're possibly at the beginning of a solar cycle called a Maunder Minimum, an interval where there is little to no solar flaring. Maunder Minimums occur every 600,000-700,000 years and can last from one week to 10,000 years. The effects of this type of interval are predicted to be exacerbated by the lessening strength of our magnetic shield, which has been diminishing for the last 400 years and continues to decline as evidenced by the speed of the magnetic pole shift currently taking place. The cause of this loss of magnetism may be deep within the planet's core, but it also affecting atmospheric fields as well. Such a scenario begs the question of what happens to magnetized liquid when it loses cohesion. The answer is potentially very, very bad stuff.

The changes to our planet are not limited locally. Every body in the solar system has been impacted to some degree. The orbit of Venus has actually slowed down and storms on Saturn are less intense and occurring two years early. The Great Red Spot on Jupiter has been replaced by Red Jr., a smaller spot in the Southern Hemisphere. I was going to post a link here for a video clip that provided reference sources, but the PTB has seen fit to have it removed from YouTube. That in itself should give you a clue.

Small to medium solar flares help keep our atmosphere expanded, so a lack of these is significant for more severe weather; floods, drought, hotter summers, colder winters and so on. There has been severe snowstorms in Iran and Pakistan and even snow in the Sahara recently. The times, they are a-changing.

My intent isn't to alarm or unduly panic anyone. It's simply a heads-up to prepare for what's to come.

Peace, love and joy to you this day, brothers and sisters.

(02-08-2017, 12:37 PM)Cirocco Wrote: [ -> ]Small to medium solar flares help keep our atmosphere expanded, so a lack of these is significant for more severe weather; floods, drought, hotter summers, colder winters and so on. There has been severe snowstorms in Iran and Pakistan and even snow in the Sahara recently. The times, they are a-changing.

My intent isn't to alarm or unduly panic anyone. It's simply a heads-up to prepare for what's to come.

Peace, love and joy to you this day, brothers and sisters.

Eh, this one goes both ways though. It's also been a long time since we had a massive solar flare's ejecta directly strike the Earth either, not since before the electronic age. Which is good, because a sufficiently massive solar flare and hit would act as a worldwide EMP. Increased weather irregularities are bad, but instantaneous global shutdown of most/all electronics would be far worse.

We even had a near miss in 2012 which would have caused global disruption and a timeline of years to even begin to pick up the pieces. Assuming society didn't collapse or anything like that, which would be a possibility depending on when it happened and how much damage was caused.

So on the whole, I think I'm OK with the prospect of fewer solar storms.

(02-08-2017, 01:01 PM)APeacefulWarrior Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-08-2017, 12:37 PM)Cirocco Wrote: [ -> ]Small to medium solar flares help keep our atmosphere expanded, so a lack of these is significant for more severe weather; floods, drought, hotter summers, colder winters and so on. There has been severe snowstorms in Iran and Pakistan and even snow in the Sahara recently. The times, they are a-changing.

My intent isn't to alarm or unduly panic anyone. It's simply a heads-up to prepare for what's to come.

Peace, love and joy to you this day, brothers and sisters.

Eh, this one goes both ways though. It's also been a long time since we had a massive solar flare's ejecta directly strike the Earth either, not since before the electronic age. Which is good, because a sufficiently massive solar flare and hit would act as a worldwide EMP. Increased weather irregularities are bad, but instantaneous global shutdown of most/all electronics would be far worse.

We even had a near miss in 2012 which would have caused global disruption and a timeline of years to even begin to pick up the pieces. Assuming society didn't collapse or anything like that, which would be a possibility depending on when it happened and how much damage was caused.

So on the whole, I think I'm OK with the prospect of fewer solar storms.

My apologies for being unclear. If the loss of planetary magnetism is due to a loss of cohesion in the Earth's core and the atmospheric shields are weakening any solar activity striking the surface here would be potentially poisonous to all life forms due to radiation.

(02-08-2017, 01:06 PM)Cirocco Wrote: [ -> ]My apologies for being unclear. If the loss of planetary magnetism is due to a loss of cohesion in the Earth's core and the atmospheric shields are weakening any solar activity striking the surface here would be potentially poisonous to all life forms due to radiation.

Those are all some pretty big IFs, though. And on top of that, there's IF the magnetic shield effect is substantial, which is something that's still being debated. After all, we have evidence of polar reversals happening every few hundred thousand years, but no evidence of Earth ever having been left completely defenseless or of massive die-offs due to solar activity. So you're talking about IF something happened that, as far as we can tell, has never before happened in the history of life on Earth.

I'm just saying, it's not necessarily something worth worrying too much about. Even if the polar reversal happens in our lifetime, it's likely to be more of a large-scale inconvenience than a true disaster.

(02-08-2017, 01:25 PM)APeacefulWarrior Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-08-2017, 01:06 PM)Cirocco Wrote: [ -> ]My apologies for being unclear. If the loss of planetary magnetism is due to a loss of cohesion in the Earth's core and the atmospheric shields are weakening any solar activity striking the surface here would be potentially poisonous to all life forms due to radiation.

Those are all some pretty big IFs, though. And on top of that, there's IF the magnetic shield effect is substantial, which is something that's still being debated. After all, we have evidence of polar reversals happening every few hundred thousand years, but no evidence of Earth ever having been left completely defenseless or of massive die-offs due to solar activity. So you're talking about IF something happened that, as far as we can tell, has never before happened in the history of life on Earth.

I'm just saying, it's not necessarily something worth worrying too much about. Even if the polar reversal happens in our lifetime, it's likely to be more of a large-scale inconvenience than a true disaster.

It's true that pole shifts have occurred in the past, but it's also true that our sun has never been as old as it is now.

Like my Bubbe used to say, "It's better to have and not need than to need and not have." and "The whole world is shaped like a chicken." Wink

(02-08-2017, 01:30 PM)Cirocco Wrote: [ -> ]It's true that pole shifts have occurred in the past, but it's also true that our sun has never been as old as it is now.

Like my Bubbe used to say, "It's better to have and not need than to need and not have." and "The whole world is shaped like a chicken."

OK, but you indicated that due to the sun's age, it's entering a period of lessened solar flare activity. If that's true, then the sun being older now would just further reduce the chances of a catastrophe.

Besides, there's not really any "having" to be done here. If it were in the cards that a sufficiently massive solar flare could cause an extinction event, there would be even less we could do to prevent it than if we spotted a planet-killer asteroid headed our way. At least we have theoretical plans for maybe dealing with that. A stellar extinction event might as well be the finger of god smiting us, for all we could do about it.

So there's really little point in worrying about it at all, particularly since such a disaster seems pretty low-probability to begin with. Smile

(02-08-2017, 01:53 PM)APeacefulWarrior Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-08-2017, 01:30 PM)Cirocco Wrote: [ -> ]It's true that pole shifts have occurred in the past, but it's also true that our sun has never been as old as it is now.

Like my Bubbe used to say, "It's better to have and not need than to need and not have." and "The whole world is shaped like a chicken."

OK, but you indicated that due to the sun's age, it's entering a period of lessened solar flare activity. If that's true, then the sun being older now would just further reduce the chances of a catastrophe.

Besides, there's not really any "having" to be done here. If it were in the cards that a sufficiently massive solar flare could cause an extinction event, there would be even less we could do to prevent it than if we spotted a planet-killer asteroid headed our way. At least we have theoretical plans for maybe dealing with that. A stellar extinction event might as well be the finger of god smiting us, for all we could do about it.

So there's really little point in worrying about it at all, particularly since such a disaster seems pretty low-probability to begin with.

Once again, I apologize for being unclear.

A lack of mid-level (C class) solar flares diminishes the thickness of the lithosphere and causes a sort of atmospheric compression effect that condenses and magnifies any weather on the surface. You're talking about a solar 'kill-shot', which is possible, but it's more likely that people will succumb to overexposure and/or other weather-related causes. Monsanto is already capitalizing on this global event by developing GMO's since outdoor gardening will become extremely difficult if not impossible and I'd be willing to bet that utility rates will rise dramatically since we, the people, will have no choice but to either pay or die.

You're correct in saying that there's not much that can be done about the abovementioned solar kill-shot, but there is something that could and should have been done to help people prepare for this eventuality, which has been known for at least a decade. Housing codes should have been relaxed to allow for the construction of self-sufficient earthship homes; however, because utility companies are so very greedy it's necessary for all residential structures to be connected to public sewer/water. Gated communities have stringent rules about how homes can be modified. Many don't allow the installation of solar panels or any other energy-conservation methods that they consider 'unconventional'. Geodesic dome homes are energy-efficient and extraordinarily durable, but there aren't many of them around and banks are reluctant to grant loans for this type of home because they believe the market is fringe at best.

(02-08-2017, 02:08 PM)Cirocco Wrote: [ -> ]A lack of mid-level (C class) solar flares diminishes the thickness of the lithosphere and causes a sort of atmospheric compression effect that condenses and magnifies any weather on the surface. You're talking about a solar 'kill-shot', which is possible, but it's more likely that people will succumb to overexposure and/or other weather-related causes. Monsanto is already capitalizing on this global event by developing GMO's since outdoor gardening will become extremely difficult if not impossible and I'd be willing to bet that utility rates will rise dramatically since we, the people, will have no choice but to either pay or die.

OK, but we're back to "you're talking about things that haven't happened before." As I understand it, the sun goes through these periods of high and low solar flare activity all the time. There's very little evidence of them causing truly catastrophic weather, even during the proverbial low tides. And even if such terrible weather conditions happened, it would be hard to predict what the overall economic effects would be in the modern age, since it would be a very complicated combination of forces. Not all utilities are privatized, just for starters. And even those which are private couldn't squeeze people TOO hard, or they'd risk violence, governmental regulations, and\or nationalization, depending on local political leanings.

When it comes down to it, modern society really has never had to deal with a truly serious weather event on the scale of the Little Ice Age or something like that. There's really no telling how it would play out. Sure, there would undoubtedly be SOME opportunists trying to take advantage of the chaos, but there would still also be plenty of forces for order trying to keep damage and instability to a minimum.

After all, those utility companies also don't get paid if society grinds to a halt.

(02-08-2017, 02:28 PM)APeacefulWarrior Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-08-2017, 02:08 PM)Cirocco Wrote: [ -> ]A lack of mid-level (C class) solar flares diminishes the thickness of the lithosphere and causes a sort of atmospheric compression effect that condenses and magnifies any weather on the surface. You're talking about a solar 'kill-shot', which is possible, but it's more likely that people will succumb to overexposure and/or other weather-related causes. Monsanto is already capitalizing on this global event by developing GMO's since outdoor gardening will become extremely difficult if not impossible and I'd be willing to bet that utility rates will rise dramatically since we, the people, will have no choice but to either pay or die.

OK, but we're back to "you're talking about things that haven't happened before." As I understand it, the sun goes through these periods of high and low solar flare activity all the time. There's very little evidence of them causing truly catastrophic weather, even during the proverbial low tides. And even if such terrible weather conditions happened, it would be hard to predict what the overall economic effects would be in the modern age, since it would be a very complicated combination of forces. Not all utilities are privatized, just for starters. And even those which are private couldn't squeeze people TOO hard, or they'd risk violence, governmental regulations, and\or nationalization, depending on local political leanings.

Brother, the solar activity is only half the story. The fact that the Earth's magnetic shield is weakening also needs to be taken into consideration in addition to the pole shift, which is going to allow much more radiation into our immediate vicinity.

Complicated economics? Absolutely. Complicated for us to figure out how to make ends meet and still live in a reasonably comfortable fashion.

I no longer trust the government, friend. Do you?

When it comes down to it, modern society really has never had to deal with a truly serious weather event on the scale of the Little Ice Age or something like that. There's really no telling how it would play out. Sure, there would undoubtedly be SOME opportunists trying to take advantage of the chaos, but there would still also be plenty of forces for order trying to keep damage and instability to a minimum.

After all, those utility companies also don't get paid if society grinds to a halt.

(02-08-2017, 12:37 PM)Cirocco Wrote: [ -> ]This is a daily space weather report on solar activity and other space pertinent information. It also covers related science topics including Earth changes and new discoveries/theories for the cosmos in general. Occasionally there are political topics and comments regarding science and technology such as GMO's, climate change, etc.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsmEOvxuZMA

For those who don't know -

Our little sun has entered middle age and we're possibly at the beginning of a solar cycle called a Maunder Minimum, an interval where there is little to no solar flaring. Maunder Minimums occur every 600,000-700,000 years and can last from one week to 10,000 years. The effects of this type of interval are predicted to be exacerbated by the lessening strength of our magnetic shield, which has been diminishing for the last 400 years and continues to decline as evidenced by the speed of the magnetic pole shift currently taking place. The cause of this loss of magnetism may be deep within the planet's core, but it also affecting atmospheric fields as well. Such a scenario begs the question of what happens to magnetized liquid when it loses cohesion. The answer is potentially very, very bad stuff.

The changes to our planet are not limited locally. Every body in the solar system has been impacted to some degree. The orbit of Venus has actually slowed down and storms on Saturn are less intense and occurring two years early. The Great Red Spot on Jupiter has been replaced by Red Jr., a smaller spot in the Southern Hemisphere. I was going to post a link here for a video clip that provided reference sources, but the PTB has seen fit to have it removed from YouTube. That in itself should give you a clue.

Small to medium solar flares help keep our atmosphere expanded, so a lack of these is significant for more severe weather; floods, drought, hotter summers, colder winters and so on. There has been severe snowstorms in Iran and Pakistan and even snow in the Sahara recently. The times, they are a-changing.

My intent isn't to alarm or unduly panic anyone. It's simply a heads-up to prepare for what's to come.

Peace, love and joy to you this day, brothers and sisters.

Addendum -

The missing video clip with reference sources from YouTube has been restored.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6gteyV0vnU

The speed of the magnetic pole shift is also a cause for concern since there's a possibility of a phenomenon called a Chandler Wobble, similar to when you fill a balloon with water and roll it around, causing the water to slosh. Earth's core is a liquid. The last time this occurred fish/whale fossils and corals were deposited in the Sahara Desert.

(02-08-2017, 02:35 PM)Cirocco Wrote: [ -> ]Brother, the solar activity is only half the story. The fact that the Earth's magnetic shield is weakening also needs to be taken into consideration in addition to the pole shift, which is going to allow much more radiation into our immediate vicinity.

But then we're back to the entire theory of the magnetic field being vital as a shield being highly disputed, since the planet has gone through many pole shifts without evidence of catastrophic activity happening because of it.

These things you're worried about are ifs piled upon ifs piled upon ifs, all quite speculative and not really backed up by the historical record.

Quote:Complicated economics? Absolutely. Complicated for us to figure out how to make ends meet and still live in a reasonably comfortable fashion.

I no longer trust the government, friend. Do you?

One doesn't have to trust government in the sense you mean to trust it to act in its own rational self-interest. A country full of people who are freezing, roasting, and\or starving while their government does nothing to help is a country that's going to have a new government in short order. Or maybe no government at all. If there is one truism in all of human history, it's that when people get hungry enough, they get violent. Keeping society orderly and minimizing the damage would be the logical thing to do, otherwise the resulting instability could threaten everyone. Even the rich. Especially the rich.

(02-08-2017, 02:53 PM)Cirocco Wrote: [ -> ]The speed of the magnetic pole shift is also a cause for concern since there's a possibility of a phenomenon called a Chandler Wobble, similar to when you fill a balloon with water and roll it around, causing the water to slosh. Earth's core is a liquid. The last time this occurred fish/whale fossils and corals were deposited in the Sahara Desert.

The Chandler Wobble in Earth's rotation is a documented ongoing phenomenon. It's not something that might happen, it IS happening. All the time. Nor has it been proven to be caused by the liquid core. As I understand it, the most plausible theory at the moment is actually that it's mostly being driven by the oceans. Either way, it's totally normal.

So I'm honestly not sure what you're referring to when you talk about fossils ending up in the Sahara.

(02-08-2017, 02:56 PM)APeacefulWarrior Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-08-2017, 02:35 PM)Cirocco Wrote: [ -> ]Brother, the solar activity is only half the story. The fact that the Earth's magnetic shield is weakening also needs to be taken into consideration in addition to the pole shift, which is going to allow much more radiation into our immediate vicinity.

But then we're back to the entire theory of the magnetic field being vital as a shield being highly disputed, since the planet has gone through many pole shifts without evidence of catastrophic activity happening because of it.

These things you're worried about are ifs piled upon ifs piled upon ifs, all quite speculative and not really backed up by the historical record.

Quote:Complicated economics? Absolutely. Complicated for us to figure out how to make ends meet and still live in a reasonably comfortable fashion.

I no longer trust the government, friend. Do you?

One doesn't have to trust government in the sense you mean to trust it to act in its own rational self-interest. A country full of people who are freezing, roasting, and\or starving while their government does nothing to help is a country that's going to have a new government in short order. Or maybe no government at all. If there is one truism in all of human history, it's that when people get hungry enough, they get violent. Keeping society orderly and minimizing the damage would be the logical thing to do, otherwise the resulting instability could threaten everyone. Even the rich. Especially the rich.

Respectfully,

The historical record is not an accurate representation of the current situation.

Of course you're entitled to your own beliefs. For my part, I'm storing a lot of shelf-stable food and preparing as I see fit. If those precautions prove to be unfounded I can donate what I have to charity.

(02-08-2017, 03:05 PM)Cirocco Wrote: [ -> ]Respectfully,

The historical record is not an accurate representation of the current situation.

Of course you're entitled to your own beliefs. For my part, I'm storing a lot of shelf-stable food and preparing as I see fit. If those precautions prove to be unfounded I can donate what I have to charity.

OK, but you're not giving me any reason to believe otherwise, either. Why is it do you think that now is the time that humans all over the world would suddenly prefer to roll over and die -or watch their families die- instead of going after the government and\or oligarchs? I mean, we're not talking about complicated social phenomenon here. We're talking about the human animal in its most primal sense, fighting to live. This basic impulse has shown itself over and over and over and over throughout history.

And moreover, why do you believe that the governments are aware of this shift in attitude to such an extent that they would knowingly and deliberately allow widespread misery to occur, without doing anything to try to prevent or alleviate it?

Not to mention, it's not like the rich and elite could somehow maintain society all by themselves in the event of a collapse. Power plants need workers. Power plants need energy sources. Energy sources need workers making them available. Those workers need roads, and food, and clothing. Roads and food and clothing which need the power sources to continue being made and maintained. Etc. This isn't even sociology, it's just the basic facts of how modern society functions. Knock away even a few of those "legs" and the whole system would collapse quickly due to its interconnected/interdependent nature. That would be as bad for the rich as everyone else.

So why in the world would a government NOT act to prevent such collapse from occurring by helping keep the public -and therefore society- relatively stable?

(And, again, I just want to point out that all of this is predicated on a very unlikely series of events happening in the first place that would make such questions relevant.)

(02-08-2017, 03:27 PM)APeacefulWarrior Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-08-2017, 03:05 PM)Cirocco Wrote: [ -> ]Respectfully,

The historical record is not an accurate representation of the current situation.

Of course you're entitled to your own beliefs. For my part, I'm storing a lot of shelf-stable food and preparing as I see fit. If those precautions prove to be unfounded I can donate what I have to charity.

OK, but you're not giving me any reason to believe otherwise, either. Why is it do you think that now is the time that humans all over the world would suddenly prefer to roll over and die -or watch their families die- instead of going after the government and\or oligarchs? I mean, we're not talking about complicated social phenomenon here. We're talking about the human animal in its most primal sense, fighting to live. This basic impulse has shown itself over and over and over and over throughout history.

And moreover, why do you believe that the governments are aware of this shift in attitude to such an extent that they would knowingly and deliberately allow widespread misery to occur, without doing anything to try to prevent or alleviate it?

Not to mention, it's not like the rich and elite could somehow maintain society all by themselves in the event of a collapse. Power plants need workers. Power plants need energy sources. Energy sources need workers making them available. Those workers need roads, and food, and clothing. Roads and food and clothing which need the power sources to continue being made and maintained. Etc. This isn't even sociology, it's just the basic facts of how modern society functions. Knock away even a few of those "legs" and the whole system would collapse quickly due to its interconnected/interdependent nature. That would be as bad for the rich as everyone else.

So why in the world would a government NOT act to prevent such collapse from occurring by helping keep the public -and therefore society- relatively stable?

(And, again, I just want to point out that all of this is predicated on a very unlikely series of events happening in the first place that would make such questions relevant.)

You're not a Wanderer. You argue like a social media troll.

I was legitimately trying to get more information about your beliefs. I truly don't understand why you think that the governments of the world would act in such a self-destructive manner, at least as I see it. You made a number of assertions about what you think may happen in the future, yet now you're insulting me rather than explaining your reasoning. Even though I explained my reasoning at some length.

If you want to say "we should agree to disagree" and end the conversation there, fine. We can do that. But you have no cause to call me a troll just because I'm asking questions you apparently don't want to answer. Just say you don't want to talk about it any more, without the insults, and we can move on.

(02-08-2017, 03:51 PM)APeacefulWarrior Wrote: [ -> ]I was legitimately trying to get more information about your beliefs. I truly don't understand why you think that the governments of the world would act in such a self-destructive manner, at least as I see it. You made a number of assertions about what you think may happen in the future, yet now you're insulting me rather than explaining your reasoning. Even though I explained my reasoning at some length.

If you want to say "we should agree to disagree" and end the conversation there, fine. We can do that. But you have no cause to call me a troll just because I'm asking questions you apparently don't want to answer. Just say you don't want to talk about it any more, without the insults, and we can move on.

Your point is specious. I posted the video clip with all the associated hard science reference sources that can and should be verified independently.

Re: Trusting the government

Executive Order 6102
Executive Order 13603

Cirocco - is this you? - or has your account been hacked?

(02-08-2017, 10:45 PM)SMC Wrote: [ -> ]Cirocco - is this you? - or has your account been hacked?

It's me. I'm just sick of trolls.

APeacefulWarrior isn't a troll - I can vouch for that .

I find it very interesting! I have listened to his daily report off and on for years and he seems very knowledgeable. Thank you for sharing!

(02-08-2017, 11:21 PM)hounsic Wrote: [ -> ]I find it very interesting! I have listened to his daily report off and on for years and he seems very knowledgeable. Thank you for sharing!

You're most welcome. Ben has a little baby now. Well, not so little. I think she must be about 2 1/2 or 3 years old now. Cute as a bug's ear.

Dope. I look forward to earthwide extinction events. I'm not even being sarcastic either; I legitimately would love to live during a quasi-apocalyptic time. I must have some incarnation somewhen that exists in a post-apocalyptic time.

I do know that if I saw a giant nuclear sunflare hurling toward us to wipe us out, I would spread myself out on the grass and smile at the ever-giving sun for freeing me from what I often perceive to be a prison Smile

but until that time, of course, I must strive to remember why this body is actually something I have worked hard to achieve. In any case, I ain't worried, yo. I'm also unwilling to prepare for these sorts of events. I would rather be completely unprepared. I honestly feel like if this sort of thing happened, there's this inner part of my being that would eagerly rise to the challenge.

I really think the apocalypse would be an unfair advantage to the strengthening of our faith. Like if evolution were a game (spoiler: it is), the other beings would all be like, "HEY, no fair, you used a performance-enhancing incarnation!!" Because what else do you rely on in such a survival-threatening experience? Nothing but your faith.

So that's why the apocalypse isn't gonna happen. We humans aren't looking for survival games any more. We've had thousands of years of that, we're bored now. We humans are gearing up for some higher chakra experiences now.

Tangent: I wonder what a higher chakra apocalypse would be like. If for example apocalypse-type events generally forces communities to utilize the lower three chakras (for survival and community), what sort of event would force communities to band together on the heart level, or throat level? I wonder if there are "apocalypses" in the higher densities, in the sense that they 'force' the social memory complexes to pay explicit attention to their lessons. There would be no fear involved, I assume, as there is in the third density apocalypse scenarios.

(02-08-2017, 10:48 PM)Cirocco Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-08-2017, 10:45 PM)SMC Wrote: [ -> ]Cirocco - is this you? - or has your account been hacked?

It's me. I'm just sick of trolls.

Man, if you are really going through life declaring anyone a "troll" for merely disagreeing with you, you're going to end up needlessly burning a lot of bridges.

And in the meantime, is it really so terrible and offensive that I would dare suggest that just maybe there isn't as much cause for fear as you think? It appears you'd rather insult me than consider the possibility that things aren't that bad. Are your worries and doomsday scenarios truly so precious to you that you'll attack anyone who tries to offer an alternative interpretation?

Sad

(02-09-2017, 01:27 AM)sjel Wrote: [ -> ]So that's why the apocalypse isn't gonna happen. We humans aren't looking for survival games any more. We've had thousands of years of that, we're bored now. We humans are gearing up for some higher chakra experiences now.

Not to mention that if anything Ra said about the Logoi and the Council of Saturn is correct, humanity is basically the end-game of a campaign that's been going on for a couple billion years. It's hard to imagine why they would allow another apocalypse to happen, when they'd worked so long and so hard to inspire self-aware life to finally come into existence.

But yeah, I agree. Humans are, in the grand scheme, finally putting away their toys and starting to look for new pastimes. There are still some who want to hold to the old ways of fear and hate and anger, but I do believe their numbers are being steadily reduced over time.

Quote:Tangent: I wonder what a higher chakra apocalypse would be like. If for example apocalypse-type events generally forces communities to utilize the lower three chakras (for survival and community), what sort of event would force communities to band together on the heart level, or throat level? I wonder if there are "apocalypses" in the higher densities, in the sense that they 'force' the social memory complexes to pay explicit attention to their lessons. There would be no fear involved, I assume, as there is in the third density apocalypse scenarios.

I doubt it. I'd guess that such events could really only happen in heavily-veiled places like Earth. If a group of entities has contact with the Creator and know Intelligent Infinity, I doubt anything could occur which would create anything like that same sense of urgency.

Heh, well, at least not on the positive side. I imagine negatives probably could manage such situations, if they were sufficiently cut off from higher knowledge. Offhand, I wonder if that sort of thinking is one of the things that holds 5D and 6D negative S-M-Cs together in the first place. There would have to be pretty large external pressures to convince a whole lot of negative entities to put aside their fear and distrust of each other to kinda-sorta work together.

(02-09-2017, 02:07 AM)APeacefulWarrior Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-08-2017, 10:48 PM)Cirocco Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-08-2017, 10:45 PM)SMC Wrote: [ -> ]Cirocco - is this you? - or has your account been hacked?

It's me. I'm just sick of trolls.

Man, if you are really going through life declaring anyone a "troll" for merely disagreeing with you, you're going to end up needlessly burning a lot of bridges.

And in the meantime, is it really so terrible and offensive that I would dare suggest that just maybe there isn't as much cause for fear as you think? It appears you'd rather insult me than consider the possibility that things aren't that bad. Are your worries and doomsday scenarios truly so precious to you that you'll attack anyone who tries to offer an alternative interpretation?

You've completely missed the point because you never looked at the source material to verify what I posted.

(02-09-2017, 03:50 AM)Cirocco Wrote: [ -> ]You've completely missed the point because you never looked at the source material to verify what I posted.

Except I did. I watched your videos.

But they did not entirely support some of the things you said, and in other places they were at least somewhat at odds with what's commonly accepted theory as I understand it. Plus, they certainly didn't address the claims you were making that the corporations\governments would go full-on chaotic evil, so to speak, if the weather became bad enough. And in every reply I made, I explained WHY I disagreed.

If you'd like some links:

The idea that the magnetic field is a vital protection against radiation is still being heavily debated, because the atmosphere itself also provides substantial protection.

There is no evidence that the polar reversal would leave the Earth defenseless.

Massive solar flares would be a threat to electronics, but almost certainly not to life on Earth.

In fairness, there is some evidence to suggest a massive flare might have contributed to the die-off of the Mammoths and other large animals of that era but, even if that's true, it obviously didn't stop humanity. So while an even worse flare may be theoretically possible, it'd be the largest and most deadly solar flare EVER, a truly unprecedented event.

The Chandler Wobble is a well-known and ongoing phenomenon, a totally normal quirk of Earth's rotation, that's currently thought to be caused by the oceans.

As for the idea that a lack of solar flares could cause atmospheric compression so severe it would create disastrous weather, that's also highly speculative. Even the idea that a solar minimum contributed to the Little Ice Age is considered quite questionable, since the dates don't entirely line up. (The worst of the Little Ice Age was actually doing a period of increased solar activity.) While unpredictable weather is certainly an issue - due to global climate change if nothing else - it's very unlikely to be so severe as to cause some sort of doomsday scenario. Although it could certainly make for refugee problems that dwarf the current issues we're facing, particularly in the equatorial regions.

And so, in the end, I am simply not convinced that these are fears which are worth being overly concerned about. Every one seems to be a long-shot scenario at best.

So, please. If you don't want to discuss this further or just want to say "Well, that's YOUR belief," fine. But these attacks on my character are getting a little wearying. If you really have nothing else to say about these matters that don't involve belittling me in some fashion, then it's almost certainly time to cut this discussion off before it becomes unnecessarily nasty or counterproductive.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZBtkIU-Qoo

Coronal holes, small C class sunspots, sprites, rogue planets and diminished solar wind.

I think something to add to consideration, apw, is that never before have we seen what changes will come to Earth as 3D becomes potentiated and 4D manifests.

Ra explicitly states this, and this paints not many future scenarios, one day, Humanity won't be on Earth, our 3D being will either evolve into 4D, be removed from Earth, or go extinct.

If the sun has anything to do with this, it could be as simple as perfect timing for it to be doing as it does intensifying our own weather patterns. Maybe we will be hit with a solar flare, and that'll be how Harvest comes about, the light literally coming to us O:

I think you and cirocco might have interesting conversations if you both can get passed your interestingly contrasting views of the future, with cirocco 'prepping' for any 'shtf' scenarios (it sounds like), and you being content to let the world unfold without taking precautions.

One day, water will be scarce unless we do something about it now.
One day, the earth won't be fertile, and we will have to leave. (Interstellar)
One day, man. One day is all it takes for humanity to go bye bye. An entire planet was allowed to be blown apart, another allowed to have it's atmosphere die off, Earth isn't special. We like to arrogantly believe we are some kind of cosmic snowflake in the cosmos that is being preserved by some snowflake enthusiast, but the reality is if an asteroid is programmed to come give us a permanent style good bye kiss, it's done.

My mom used to tell me about the 'nuclear drills' she and her classmates back in the day had to perform. Basically, you'd get under your desk, tuck your head between your legs, and kiss your ass good bye Wink

So, for some, especially the older generations, the horror of an 'apocalypse' isn't too far-fetched, and we can see this collective awareness in humanity manifesting long before 2012. It begun it seems around the time of 4D energies permeating Earth. Suddenly, zombies were popular, nuclear apocalypse was feasible, a technological collapse of society seemed legitimately possible, then the realizations of all that could go wrong! Alien invasion, world wide global catastrophe, nuclear war, cosmic 'intervention' like asteroids or gamma ray bursts of a pulsar wave frying the planet.

From the moon to the sun to space radiation to earth radiation, a volcano in yellowstone park could blow and that'd mark the start of a new ice age, an event that practically wipes out most life on the surface.

The possibilities and potentials are there, and thankfully it seems the Confederation works well to keep these things from manifesting.

I personally have felt the pull towards an apocalypse (my name belongs to an ability to a character in an apocalypse novel of mine, in fact basically 95% of my novel writing is based in an apocalyptic setting). I mean, we already have the prerequisites from Fukushima cooking the oceans. The ecosystem collapse will culminate in a world famine, on top of a dwindling clean water supply PLUS famines, you have a recipe for the collapse of an entire civilization back into chaotic times leading up to extinction, the most we have to look forward to then should all restoration efforts fail, is cannibalizing ourselves to extinction faster, as our bodies become the only animal's/sustenance left to be fed upon.

It's not all love and light all day every day in the ways we might think. One day, one day maybe millions of years from now, or a few decades, Humanity is gonna be going bye bye.

And unless you know a friendly Q Continuum member or a very sympathetic God, I don't think there's much humanity will be able to do to stop this inevitability.

Pages: 1 2

Cirocco

APeacefulWarrior

Cirocco

APeacefulWarrior

Cirocco

APeacefulWarrior

Cirocco

APeacefulWarrior

Cirocco

Cirocco

APeacefulWarrior

APeacefulWarrior

Cirocco

APeacefulWarrior

Cirocco

APeacefulWarrior

Cirocco

smc

Cirocco

smc

hounsic

Cirocco

sjel

sjel

APeacefulWarrior

APeacefulWarrior

Cirocco

APeacefulWarrior

Cirocco

Coordinate_Apotheosis