(08-06-2010, 02:10 PM)Questioner Wrote: [ -> ]P, your questions would be excellent for a future Q'uo session.
I can speculate on several potential reasons for the apparent discrepancies.
- Perhaps Ra spoke accurately and you are misunderstanding.
As I have previously mentioned, Ra's words are concise and easy to understand.
(08-06-2010, 02:10 PM)Questioner Wrote: [ -> ]- Perhaps Ra intended to be accurate and this material got distorted in the communication and transcription process.
I could see this as a possibility, but since there was one number, 4, and the fact that 3 and 5 will not work into the number of triangles on the side of a pyramid, this is not probable.
(08-06-2010, 02:10 PM)Questioner Wrote: [ -> ]- Perhaps Ra intended to speak in code and you haven't cracked the code yet or found the key.
Ra did not speak in code. Ra chose either to give an answer or cite the law of confusion as the means to not provide an answer.
(08-06-2010, 02:10 PM)Questioner Wrote: [ -> ]- Ra mentioned that Ra built the pyramid by thought, in a way that made it seem to have been laboriously constructed by human effort. Perhaps after Ra's direct intervention failed to bring the results Ra hoped for, Ra might have rebuilt the Pyramid by thought. Ra's descriptions in the books may accurately reflect the Pyramid's structure and function at the time of its active use, but not the Pyramid's current remodeled structure that prevents it from having spiritual function at this time.
Ra is not the construction company down the street. Ra is a social memory complex with access to intelligent infinity. Ra built a working pyramid, more than 20,000,000 stones each weighing between 1 and 200 tons in weight, put together so perfectly that even today a piece of paper cannot fit between them. There was no mistake.
(08-06-2010, 02:10 PM)Questioner Wrote: [ -> ]- Perhaps this material is deliberately misleading so as to derail any attempt to re-use Pyramid power, since Ra saw the past attempt went poorly but can't come right out and say "don't go there" while respecting our free will.
Improbable. If there is any misleading, it is due to man's efforts.
(08-06-2010, 02:10 PM)Questioner Wrote: [ -> ]- Perhaps the proportions are off considering the historic loss of the top of the Pyramid and burial of its base.
Irregardless of the loss of the casing, the inside measurements are still the inside measurements. If I call a cat's tail a leg, how many legs will that cat have? Four. Calling a tail a leg does not make it a leg.
(08-06-2010, 02:10 PM)Questioner Wrote: [ -> ]- Or something else neither of us can imagine right now.
Or something we can.
(08-06-2010, 02:10 PM)Questioner Wrote: [ -> ]As you see there's no shortage of speculative answers. It would be very cool if Q'uo could directly address this confusion in an upcoming session.
Agreed, though I think there are more pressing issues that the majority would prefer to discuss. This could in no way be considered a priority request.
(08-06-2010, 06:53 PM)Namaste Wrote: [ -> ]Just to add, the location of the chamber, along with Ra's description of where the perfect placement is, has bugged me for a while.
Agreed. I don't think the placement of anything is off as per Ra's concise explanation. I think we are mislead in published diagrams.
(08-06-2010, 06:41 AM)unity100 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-06-2010, 03:56 AM)Peregrinus Wrote: [ -> ]This is what I am trying to determine, whether it was sarcophagus size, or chamber size.
pyramid's size.
as far what Ra says, pyramid's function is dependent on the geometrical proportions of pyramid. ie, it has the same energy concentrating function in time/space, even if you make it out of 4 long sticks placed and proportioned correctly against each other. the concentration of energy happens in the precise point proportional to the pyramid's proportions. if you make its height lower, the concentration point goes lower.
if you make the pyramid big enough, then the concentration happening would be able to engulf entire body of a human in size. its not relevant to chambers.
What I am trying to discern is some type of understanding of the size of the channel of intelligent infinity which is formed. Obviously the larger the pyramid, the larger this channel. I do not think the pyramid require to be as large as it was; this was said to Ra to make the impression of towering size, or in other words, create awe.
Quote:Ra: ... For the purposes of initiation, the size needed to be large enough to create the impression of towering size so that the entrance point of multi-dimensional intelligent infinity would completely pervade and fill the channel, the entire body being able to rest in this focused area. Furthermore, it was necessary for healing purposes that both channel and the one to be healed be able to rest within that focused point.
(08-06-2010, 06:41 AM)unity100 Wrote: [ -> ]whereas king's chamber is not for initiation, but healing work, due to the fact that energies concentrating there disrupt the violet ray of entities. when violet ray of an entity is disrupted, healing can be done by adept :
Quote:55.12 Questioner: Then would the healing work be done in the King’s Chamber?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. We may note that such terminology is not our own.
55.13 Questioner: Yes, I understand that. It is just that it is the common naming of the two chambers of the Great Pyramid. I don’t know whether this line of questioning is going to take me to a better understanding of the energies, but until I have explored the concepts there is nothing much that I can do but to ask a few questions.
There is a chamber below the bottom level of the pyramid, down below ground, that appears to be roughly in line with the King’s Chamber. What is that chamber?
Ra: I am Ra. We may say that there is information to be gained from this line of querying. The chamber you request to be informed about is a resonating chamber. The bottom of such a structure, in order to cause the appropriate distortions for healing catalyst, shall be open.
55.14 Questioner: The book, The Life Force of the Great Pyramid, has related the ankh shape with a resonance in the pyramid. Is this a correct analysis?
Ra: I am Ra. We have scanned your mind and find the phrase “working with crayons.” This would be applicable. There is only one significance to these shapes such as the crux ansata; that is the placing in coded form of mathematical relationships.
The diagram's placement of the kings chamber, then, being off center makes sense, for this would be a turbulent and disruptive area to the indigo, and yet it is not placed as per Ra's explanation.
(08-06-2010, 06:41 AM)unity100 Wrote: [ -> ]i don't understand why are you placing the rooms differently by the way. the king's queen's and the bottom rooms are in the places they were when Ra built the pyramid. they havent been changed. the pyramid is rather off balance and not functioning fully because quakes etc and magnetic pole shifts have changed the alignment the pyramid was aligned for.
I agree the rooms are in the places they were when Ra built the pyramid. I am however unconvinced that the diagrams which we see show the true locations.
I placed the rooms differently to match what was said by Ra to be the placement.
(08-06-2010, 06:41 AM)unity100 Wrote: [ -> ]if you build your pyramid big enough (even if a pyramid of sticks) and sit in the queen's chamber in the proportional place queen's chamber is in in the great pyramid, you will get the same effect provided that pyramid is correctly aligned.
Again, agreed.