I should probably preface this by saying these are fairly contentious topics, so there are likely to be other opinions than mine....
(07-16-2017, 06:02 PM)FieryCajunGirl Wrote: [ -> ]Can you determine someone else's polarity and density?
Is it right to do that? Is it fair to that person?
Broadly speaking: No, no, and no. Among the consequences of being veiled is that our hearts are hidden from each other. Because we have no way of accurately knowing each others' intentions, that makes it incredibly difficult to gauge their polarity. And merely observing outcomes isn't sufficient - a well-intentioned person can easily cause poor outcomes due to a lack of wisdom, for example, rather than malicious intent. Imo, in only the rarest of cases is someone's behavior going to be so extreme - in either direction - that even taking a guess at their polarity would be justifiable.
Otherwise, all too often such guessing just becomes part of an effort to divide up the world into "us" and "them," which is both against the LOO philosophy which Ra taught and also a somewhat negative behavior on its own.
(As a corollary, it's also important to remember that pretty much everyone on Earth is going to have somewhat mixed polarity. An otherwise-positive person could still exhibit negative behaviors from time to time, and vice-versa.)
Quote:When you say switched, does that mean being around another person who resonates at a different frequency can actually change your own? If so can't they be the one to change?
In virtually all cases, it would be reciprocal. The typical result of a negative and a positive entity interacting is a loss of polarity on both sides. However, this exchange would not necessarily be 1:1, depending on each entity's existing level of polarity as well as their levels of wisdom and/or connection to Intelligent Infinity. Or, more or less, a strongly positive person would probably be able to influence a weakly-negative person to a greater extent, or (again) vice-versa.
Quote:When you steer clear is that service to self? What if you could be of service to the other instead of avoiding/steering clear... which could ultimately be of service to self and others just by not avoiding?
What if it was your child in a negative polarity - do you stay, avoid or help enlighten?
Here's the point where I get particularly contentious. My understanding is that the mere act of deliberately avoiding or cutting off contact with a negative person would, itself, be a negatively-polarizing act. An entity with sufficiently high levels of positive polarization would love and offer service to anyone, recognizing all to equally be the Creator and therefore all equally worthy of aid. And avoiding negative entities would, by definition, be prioritizing one's self ahead of others. That's a very slippery slope which can easily end up at tribalist thinking that actively excludes those who are considered different.
But, again, life on Earth is complicated and there aren't set answers. There are probably situations where it would be pragmatically wiser to avoid offering too much service to those who are too heavily negative. But, then, that goes back to the more underlying problem that accurately gauging the polarity levels of anyone is extremely difficult. My own take is that unless one is contemplating offering service to someone who is literally Hitler, it's probably better to err on the side of love and service. (Assuming greater positive polarization is the goal, obviously.)