The problem becomes that when we begin to delegitimize labels, that those who still depend upon them for their yellow-ray identity can feel even more marginalized when we say things like "trans doesn't exist" or "race don't exist". I think we have to find a way of achieving equality BEFORE we just eliminate these words. I understand the ideology, but I don't think it's that easy for native third density beings, and those are the ones who need the most help at this transition. Sure, those of us who have harvested past this density see this as obvious, but it takes a bit more nuance to alleviate these issues. In fact, until we can even have these discussions without using words of separation, it comes from a place of hypocrisy - even in our best attempts, it's nigh impossible to not use terms that define us as separate. So why don't we just hear each other out and listen to people's pain, instead of contorting our language in different ways so that we can ignore those things that cause us discomfort?
I mean, third density requires labels, requires separation, requires us to "internalize the polarity of our dimension". I have one body, it is connected with all others, yes. But when I have a problem with my hand, I'm not going to call it my foot and expect it to receive the specific care that it needs to thrive. If I treat it like a foot, things aren't going to heal as well as if I were just willing to admit that it was a hand with fingers.
Social identity comes from the yellow ray. Not understanding or rejecting the social identity of others constitutes as a yellow ray blockage
within the self. Sure, it might be a reflection of their blockages that you pick up upon, but a healthy, crystallized yellow ray is often supported by "identity" words. I don't believe that removing all forms of identity is the proper way to balance the yellow ray. One must still understand/accept/integrate themselves into society. Please understand that by default, it is easier for a white, Christian, American male, than for a black, trans, Haitian women who wants to be recognized as equal.
There are so many people who are doing good, hard, legitimate work in the yellow-ray sphere. Eliminating the use of words that bother us is not aiding their efforts. We must recognize that we treat others different because of these labels, then we can address the use of language. Just eliminating the words doesn't mean that racism and sexism are going to go away. Plus, those who are the most racist and sexist will never stop using hateful terminology, so we're going to get halfway there and then create more separation. When I hear words like man, black, Muslim, I do not think of it as separation! I think what a beautiful and colorful planet we have with unique facets of the Creator! I also think about all the work we have yet before us to integrate our society into a social memory complex. I wish it were this easy, but this is just an attempt to put the responsibility of what everyone recognizes as a problem onto others. If a black person decides to stop seeing themselves as black, that doesn't stop random racists from calling them a racial slur.
As an aside, if people are sheltered from this still happening: My friend has three grandchildren who are of mixed race. Just two days ago, their neighbor called them "n-s" and "monkeys". Three children under the age of 7. This might have been the first time any of them even conceptualized what their race was, and it was external. Does this practical advice actually work in application - as in, those who are causing pain through separation, are they going to be adopters of this "we are all one" vision? Does telling the children that "race doesn't exist" eliminate the pain and trauma from this event? Do you think that if she came to me specifically and expressed her pain, and my response was, "Well, race doesn't exist so racism doesn't either because it is a human construct" - do you think that she would come back to me next time she was in pain? In direct application, is this the most empathetic way to heal?
Racism exists. Elitism exists. Bigotry exists. Eliminating them in oneself is step number one, of course. But we can't eliminate these things in others if we refuse to acknowledge that they are legitimate problems. If I break my finger, but refuse to acknowledge that it is broken, and insist that there is no such thing as a broken finger because creation is perfect, how could I ever expect my finger to heal? I must say, oh yes, look at you, poor broken finger! You are not a toe, you are a finger, and you require a splint that is 3 inches long and 3/4 inch wide. And then I must give you reprieve from use for a short while, so that the bones may set. If I forget that it is injured, and again, halfway through healing, say "Oh, there is no such thing as a broken finger!" then it is at risk of being weakened further, and upon the bone setting, it may not happen properly, and then the injury becomes permanent.
If all of your fingers are healed, then it should be easier to recognize when someone else's fingers are broken, and this should be the attempts that we make towards healing others and our planet. None of this, "My finger isn't broken, and because we are one, therefore your finger isn't broken, either!" It's actually the opposite, in a service to others creation - when someone else's finger is broken, then so too should your finger feel the pain of being immobile and useless. Anything less is the true genesis of separation.
Quote:14.18 Questioner: Then for the last 2,300 years you have been actively working to create as large a harvest as possible at the end of the total 75,000-year cycle. Can you state with respect to the Law of One why you do this, just as a statement of your reasons for this?
Ra: I am Ra. I speak for the social memory complex termed Ra. We came among you to aid you. Our efforts in service were perverted. Our desire then is to eliminate as far as possible the distortions caused by those misreading our information and guidance. The general cause of service such as the Confederation offers is that of the primal distortion of the Law of One, which is service. The One Being of the creation is like unto a body, if you will accept this third-density analogy. Would we ignore a pain in the leg? A bruise upon the skin? A cut which is festering? No. There is no ignoring a call. We, the entities of sorrow, choose as our service the attempt to heal the sorrow which we are calling analogous to the pains of a physical body complex distortion.