(09-18-2019, 07:54 AM)Infinite Wrote: [ -> ]Ra used the word "Logos" in two manners. Logos as the intelligent infinity/Love and Logos as individual portions of intelligent infinity. I suppose the indigo-ray body is an analogous to the last.
So are the Logoi intelligent energy?
Splitting hairs
What does
logos,
intelligent, and
energy even mean (a Greek, Latin, and again Greek word used whilst speaking English)? One should start there perhaps. Why are these words chosen to convey a particular concept? Could there be more appropriate terms? Could their use beget more confusion than they attempt to alleviate?
Infinity/Oneness is "What-Is". Unmeasurable, uncountable, unseeable, undefinable, unspeakable.
Infinity does this activity called creating. This activity (the
verb) is what ancient Greeks called Logos ("Word/Speech"). What you may call Love. And what someone else may call "intelligent energy" or the "active, motor, kinetic principle" should they fancy more mechanical terms. It is the work, it is the action, it is the doing.
This action/creation appears or manifests as that self-reflecting material known as Light. It is basically the "paint" in the
to-be-canvas (there is no "matter" as-such or anything "solid" whatsoever, only Light).
Diffracting, weaving, distorting this Light in geometrically-kaleidoscopically-holographic-fractal patterns gives a vibrationally-hierarchical/multi-colored structure to Creation wherein evolution/growth may then take place at a gradual, progressive, measurable pace.
The apparent plurality of Logoi is just that, an
appearance, for it is in fact the same Creator painting different canvases multi/trans-dimensionally, both concurrently and in parallel, and transversely to each other.
Within Creation there comes a point wherein the illusion-bound entity
approximates, in microcosm, the macrocosmic Creator, and may thus be called "sub-logos". This is the source of the confusion, for in fact every "painted" entity within Creation, regardless of status or awareness, is
literally the Creator at all times.
However, it is categorically correct, within the Limits of Creation, to say there is such a entity/being that,
microcosmically, operates at a level similar (comparable, analogous) to that of the Creator.
This is a convoluted way to attempt to answer a simpler question. Alas, the Tower of Babble is particularly stiff here.
PS: The concept of "individuality" (in-divide-duality) is reserved only for entities undergoing an evolutionary experience of a certain kind (specifically 3D-thru-5D, with some "grey areas" in 2D and 6D being
pre- and
post-individuality as humanly defined/understood—1D/7D do not figure in this for reasons which may be self-evident). The Creator is not an individual.
(09-19-2019, 06:56 PM)Infinite Unity Wrote: [ -> ]Intelligent Infinity transformed or gave birth to Infinite Intelligence.
(09-22-2019, 12:40 AM)IndigoGeminiWolf Wrote: [ -> ]Is intelligent energy the same as infinite energy?
It is splitting yet more hairs
Ra Wrote:27.4 To define intelligent apart from infinity is difficult, for these two vibration complexes equal one concept.
Ra Wrote:15.21 This is the second distortion known to you as Logos, the Creative Principle or Love. This intelligent energy thus creates a distortion known as Light.
Ra Wrote:13.7 Awareness led to the focus of infinity into infinite energy. You have called this by various vibrational sound complexes, the most common to your ears being “Logos” or “Love.”